Originally Posted December 27th 2018
The Imperial Library of Constantinople
The Imperial Library of Constantinople would have been the equivalency to the Greek and Romans, of our Library of Congress with just a touch of the Smithsonian ideals… Borrowed from the great Wiki, we find…
The Imperial Library of Constantinople, in the capital city of the Byzantine Empire, [Where the Parrot was named 1000 years before it was known by Columbus Alexandria Constantinople .
In ancient Greece India Constantine Constantinople . The library is estimated to have contained well over 100,000 volumes of ancient text. The movement was headed by one Themistios, who commanded a group of calligraphers and librarians.[that’s Librarians, not Iberians, Librarians actually existed…]
Over the centuries, several fires in the Library of Constantinople destroyed much of the collection. [Or so it is said] The library was burnt in the year 473 and about 120,000 volumes were lost.[what a convenient time for this loss after loosing control in the Americas and being expelled, with every intention of returning some day] However, the attempts of Themistios and Constantius were not fruitless, as some works were saved and recopied and circulated through other texts. Consequently, modern knowledge of Classical Greek literature is greater than would be the case if not for their efforts.
After the fall of Constantinople on 12 April 1204, [Another convenient time for the loss of records, just after being defeated again in the Americas ] the library was allegedly destroyed by the Franks and Venetians [Italy
While there were many reports of texts surviving into the Ottoman era, no substantive portion of the library has ever been recovered. Professor Carlyle was provided access in 1800 to the Seraglio, the supposed repository of post-Ottoman conquest surviving texts, but no texts from the Imperial Library were located. A notable exception is the Archimedes Palimpsest, which surfaced in 1840, was translated in 1915 and was unaccountably found in a private collection and sold in 1998. [Imagine that, what are the odds?]
If I could I would look in the Archives of Seville and Madrid not to mention and most likely the Vatican
Why would I suspect the Vatican
Now I may not have all the details and may even be off a bit, and I am certain the delusionists would jump on board to work hard to defuse this concept in the name of diffusion, but it seems to me that at the time of the sacking of the city of Constantinople, a majority of the records were moved away with France along with Italy playing along, the records likely made their way to the Vatican, despite their differences, who was going to wage war on the Vatican? Not even the Muslims would come against their own creator of Islam.
The primary records and maps and the real history of the Roman Empire, the Greek, Indo Greek, and knowledge of the lands the many divisions of power coveted in this medieval times, would be safe to a large degree in Italy under the Catholic eye. If you were not in the good graces of the Holy Roman Emperors and those who controlled the information contained within, you would not have access. What makes it so difficult to put this all together is the lack of information other than what has been passed down, it all seems to follow where the leading crown and Catholic rule was at the time or the old adage, follow the money..
Fall of the Western Roman Empire
The “Fall of the Western Roman Empire” 476 AD, does not necessarily mean what you may think? The historians would have you thinking that this was at a time where in control of what is now Spain, France and even Italy was lost, but the West went much further west than any one supposed. The true west in this appellation of Western Roman Empire was across the west sea, the Americas
In the late 15th Century Spain was clearly in better relations with Rome as per the history suggests, this would explain why France seemed to target the upper eastern coast Iceland/Greenland approach to the Americas, using much older documents, whereas the Spanish went nearly straight for the heart of all that was coveted in the new world in Mexico and pushing North. Clearly both parties were operating on different documents or from different time frames.
In 218 BC the Romans invaded the Iberian Peninsula, which later became the Roman province of Hispania (which later evolved into "España", the Spanish word for Spain Iberian Peninsula remained under Roman rule for over 600 years, until the collapse of the Western-Roman Empire. [Approx. 500 AD]
In the Early modern period, [1494] until the 18th century, southern and insular Italy came under Spanish control, having been previously a domain of the Crown of Aragon
The Renaissance Period
1494 is an interesting date for sure, but what was it that caused a series of renaissance outbreaks at the time? What was it that brought on the jealousy of France and causing King Charles the VIII of France to suddenly invade the Italian peninsula and occupied the Kingdom of Naples Florence
Lorenzo De Medici I think had more responsibility that what wiki implies, I think it was his responsibility to ensure equalization on current historic events, but his luck ran out when he died in April of 1492. As it would seem, a fantastic event soon took place based upon a sharing of documents and maps, Columbus is reported as to having discovered, or should I say RE-discovered the former Western Roman Empire interests! Columbus returns and informs Spain Florence Florence at the time who was sending Columbus letters telling him certain privy information regarding a shorter route to the Americas
Wiki says: When Charles arrives in Florence
Piero attempted to stay neutral, but this was unacceptable to Charles, who intended to invade Tuscany
Piero quickly gave up as Charles's army neared Florence and surrendered the chief fortresses of Tuscany to the invading army, giving Charles everything he demanded.
I’m left wondering what it was that King Charles VIII of the French demanded. No matter, Charles apparently got what he wanted and the French soon put together their own Explorations to the new world. It would seem however Piero gave older information based on the route the French took rather than the route sent to Columbus
Charles VIII died in 1498 taking with him what he knew, and it would be another 25 plus years before the French was able to get into the game.
What else do the maps show?
As evidence in support of the French being singled out on updated information not only based upon the route they chose 20 some odd years after, but one such incident in history sticks out for me. The French and Italy Americas
What exactly inspire Herman Moll a late 1600’s early 1700’s Cartographer and engraver we may never know, but the one map that catches my attention is his 1715 map wherein he incorporates the Baron Lahontan’s map of Lahontan’s account of the Long River, however there are two editions, in one version he uses Lahontan’s seeming poor rendition of the Lake at the head of this Long River, the other Moll Map uses what appears to be very nice a rendition from unknown origins showing conditions that had not existed for at least 1100 years! Without going back to read his account, if memory serves me, Lahontan claims the Indians somewhere near the Missouri and Mississippi river junction told him of this large lake at the head of this Long River and about the people who lived around it. This no doubt is the same Lake the Spanish wrote of several times over and depicted on their maps with what I would call great accuracy, but how would I know this if none of them including Lahontan never found this elusive lake?
Moll himself states on the map “A great part of this map is taken from original draughts of Mr. Blackmore, the ingenious Mr. Berisford, Captain Nairn and others never before published” What other maps was he talking about? The image he uses for the lake at the end of this long river which Lahontan never made it to, is a near perfect rendition of the intended lake at its higher elevations. How would I know this? We’ll get to that. But the point here is that it is clear to me that he was using older information that could only have come from maps or information with origins prior to about 900 AD which is likely the last time the lake was seen at this higher level reveling its very identifiable arm or bay to the east.
Part 1 and 2
Now what I am about to tell you is one of those things which I have kept back in most of my writings and it is concerning this lake and the Long River
The reason I have taken notice of Lahontan’s Long River story is that the Indians could not have told him about this lake as he claimed they did, Lahontan was clearly carrying information dating back prior to 900 AD. I say this because, prior to 900 AD back to the time of the Crucifixion and possibly earlier, the lake in which Scientist claim is 33 Million years old referred to as Lake Uinta, Takes the appearance of how it would have looked in its earliest times, some even say it existed 50 Million years ago. However looking at this rendition of this lake of which there is very little information regarding it, you would likely not consider it as a candidate of the elusive Lake Copala Utah
Despite what geologist will tell you pertaining to these Colorado Mountains, “at least” the northern parts, did not exist in the days of lake Copala’s early days, Lake Coplala drained from two different effluents (Not necessarily at the same time), one to the south now regarded as the Green River and eventually joining the Colorado River, and it drained to the East and was at that time the head waters of what is now the Missouri River. At this early point of the Lakes Existence is the only time it would have taken upon the appearance shown in Herman Molls map, where did he get this from? In those days it was a beautiful lush and near tropical area. There is one other little secret, in these days when the river drained to the east out of the Uinta Basin , the river was known by the indigenous as Sidon , from this lake and all the way to the Gulf Coast Sidon was the primary river of which fed the lower portion of Mississippi River , it was the predominant river prior to the destruction at the time of the crucifixion. Today we see the Mississippi
In about 900 AD there was an uplift of which geologist say it occurred 20 million years ago, it lifted the near entire state of Utah Grand Canyon . At least the Northern parts of Colorado rose up and cut off the head drainage of the upper regions of what was known in BC times as Sidon Missouri was no longer the primary feed of the lower portion of today’s Mississippi river . The altering of the course of the river is plain to see even today, East and North East of St. Louis. The river today flows to the east of Saint Louis but on the west of East St. Louis East St. Louis
After this great event of 900 AD and the dust settled, the once beautiful Lake , surrounded by 7 Cities now in ruin, was all but gone. Over the next 100 years what was once a lush beautiful tropic environment, began its transformation to the high country desert that it is today.
Why is it I seem so confident of this hypothesis? Because I took the time to consider what others would not let their mind set venture beyond. Despite the flawed Radio Carbon Dating System and those who believe the Uinta Mountains were once covered in an ice sheet from not only one Ice age, but a second one, this lake did not exist 50 million years ago, not even 1 million years ago.
Again, who discovered America Columbus
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment!