Welcome to Tuscoro.com

Read More......


Saturday, April 20, 2019

Ancient Exploration and colonization of the Americas PART TWO


More Evidences

If you have been following, you may have in the recent past read my two part articles called If it Quacks Like A Roman, in writing this article it serves its most important (to me) purpose, it helps me to put it all into order and help me understand it. I invite the reader to re-read the article at this time…

The history is littered with accounts of members of exploration parties stemming from the times of first encounters of meeting the tribal people of this continent, incidents that took place not only here in the north but in the south as well wherein a Welsh member of the party familiar with the Welsh tongue, recognized the broken dialect of their own language when they encountered various tribes and understood what they we saying. The academics have for the most part dismissed this as mistaken, others with more of an open mind blame it upon the travels of Prince Madoc Son of the King of Wales Owain ap Grufydd of Gwynedd, and this may be in a small way true, but it has its origins from a much earlier people… and descendants of Prince Madoc/Madog.

Lately I have been drawn to my royal ancestry as some of you have notice, I was compelled as a result of trying to put the pieces of the puzzle together which I am still trying to do. I felt compelled to create an ancestry chart of my ancestors in the Welsh linage of my Royal Ancestry. In doing so it enabled me to bring things more clearly into focus by way of a timeline of events with concision with the history of the Roman Empire, Welsh history, The Kings of Britain and events, suddenly a picture began to unfold, a picture I am still not sure of and still trying to validate or disprove to myself.

In studying the plausibility of Roman presents here in the Americas, the evidences and the story told in the Tucson Lead Cross artifacts, I found corresponding history written regarding the “Western” Roman Empire, “the Fall” of the Western Roman Empire near 476 and the eventual Rise of the “Western” Roman Empire around 800 AD and I am beginning to see that it had nothing to do with Spain, France, Wales etc… in the old world, but is directly corresponding if not explicitly referring to THIS Continent and THIS is the “WESTERN Roman Empire” they are referring to! Stew on that for a bit, I know I am still after the realization a few months ago!

Also consider the time frame corresponding with the mysterious burning of the Imperial Library of Constantinople, not to mention the Great library of Alexandria? Both sides of the players had motives, it could have been burned from within and blame placed on those it was intended to be hidden from AFTER important incriminating contents had been removed or the opposite scenario. However it is the time frame, motivation and contents correlating to the WESTERN Roman Empire and the history of it that was no doubt documented that seems to be the motive. Why is it that Rome spent so much time and effort seemingly trying to destroy the Holy bloodline of the Welsh and the French Kings?

Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl Painting by
Diego Rivera

Some time ago I was researching the Toltec Kings comparing dates and time lines in the hypothesis written by the Catholic Jew, I found a rendition of Topiltzn Quetzalcoatl painted by a well know Mexican Painter Diego Rivera (1886-1957). Rivera, an Indigenous Mexican who painted Murals all over Mexico and in the United States, His Mural painted at the Palacio Nacional de Mexico of one of the most popular Toltec Kings, Topiltzin (of) Quetzalcoatl has always puzzled me. In his famous mural it is shown Quetzalcoatl flying above, with Topiltzin sitting among his subjects, If Topiltzin was the King of the Toltec and of the brown skin Toltec, why is Topiltzin pale skinned and painted looking very much European?

Welsh Genealogy

Now I confess...  I had a little help with this in that I stumbled across an article regarding the genealogy of the Roman Colonies spoken of in text of an article about the Tucson Lead Crosses. It that appeared several years ago written by an apparent sharp individual from Australia referred to as the Catholic Jew and whom I might add is an excellent blogger. All attempts to contact him or discover his source for his comments met with a dead end however, I decided to discontinue trying to find his source and simply challenge his results by giving the benefit of the doubt and presuming them to be true resorting to the test of time. So far, after some years, I can only conclude that whatever his source material, it would seem his source is valid.

I can’t say for certain as of yet that I know it is correct however it certainly meets no barriers and parallels beautifully, here is the genealogy given according to the Catholic Jew, based on his studies and the Tucson Lead Artifacts inscriptions. (Beginning with Prince Madoc)

1. Prince Madoc ap Owain of Gwynedd
2. King Owain I of Wales (b.1100 d.1170)
3. Gryffudd II ap Cynan King of Gwynedd (b.1055 d.1137)
4. Prince Cynan ap Iago the Rhodan (Chunan ben Jacob ha Rhodri)[b.1020 d.1060]married Princess Ragnhild of Dublin
5. King Iago ap Idwal (Jacob ben Israel ha Rhodri)of Gwynedd 1033-1039 [b.990 d.1039] [ younger brother of Mar Isaac ha Nehushtan (Huacmar Quetzalcoatl) of the Toltecs and Prince Lancelin of Calalus (Lain Calvo of Castile)]married Sussanah of Barcelona
6. King Israel VII ha Nehushtan of Rhoda and Calalus 999-1018 Priest- King of the Toltecs 977-999 King of Gwynedd 1023-1033 (Idwal of Wales/ Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl of the Toltecs) [b.960 d.1033]married Ximena of Rhoda daughter and heiress of King Israel VI
7. Isaac (Huacmar/ Huetzin) Priest-King of the Toltecs [b.930 d.977] [cousin of Israel VI of Calalus 955-994]
8. Prince Makhir of Calalus (Meurig/ Mixcoatl of the Toltecs/ Americ)Priest-King of the Toltecs [b.900 d.974] [cousin of King Israel V of Rhoda and Calalus 920-955]married Chimalman (Ximena/ Chimena)daughter of Israel IV of Calalus
9. Prince Isaac ha Nehushtan (Quetzalcoatl) of Rhoda Priest-King of the Toltecs [younger brother of King Israel IV of Rhoda and Calalus 883-920] [b.856 d.921]
10. King Israel III Septimus of Rhoda and Calalus (Possibly Gwriad?)[b. 832 d.900] [brother of King Rhodri Mawr of Gwynedd]married Ximena of Auvergne daughter of Makhir Bernard of Auvergne and Septimania [son of Warin of Macon b.779 son of St William of Gellone] and his wife Ava of the Spanish March [daughter of Solomon of the Spanish March]
11. King Israel II Magnarvm (Merfyn/ Mermin/ Merwan/ Makhiri) of Rhoda and Calalus (b.805 d.858) married Nest of Powys daughter of King Cadell
12. King Israel I Guriad ha Makhiri (Magnarvm) of Rhoda and Calalus (b.770 d.852) [brother of St. William Isaac of Gellone (b.755 d.814)] married Atala (Ethyl) daughter of Jacob (Iago) of Gwynedd and Bernicia King of Calalus (779-785) son of Cynan (Chunya) of Gwynedd
13. Mar Nehemiah Theodorus ha Makhiri (Deitrich/Namon) [b. 735 d.790] Ruler of Ripaurien, Saxony, Bavaria (779-790) and King of Calalus (775- 779) Jewish King of Septimania (765-775)
14. Makhir Todros ben Yehuda (Amorai/ Theodoric)[b. 710 d.765] Western Exilarch and Jewish King of Septimania

(At the end of this article I will list the actual genealogy
as it is recorded in the genealogy data bases)

It is important to understand regarding the legends of Quetzalcoatl, that he is the God who came to visit them about 2000 years ago promising to return, any designation aside from this such as Huacamar or Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl, is a designation of Topiltzin OF Quetzalcoatl, a representative or descendant of Quetzalcoatl, one with the authority of or the birth right to act instead of… You will see at the end why I have pointed this out.
In researching the Welsh or Briton names in the above genealogy given it become very apparent that at least these names or those who it represents was in fact very real people. In searching the history of these individuals it would seem a pattern emerges. This pattern is what appears to be an all-out effort to suppress the whole idea that anyone prior to Columbus is completely ridiculous. Many of the articles about the above mentioned individuals often contain phrases like, “not much is known about their early life” I wonder why?

More suggestive evidence

There are two words that is associated in the text of the Tucson Lead Crosses that if understood what they are, certainly raises an eyebrow. The two words are “Septimania” and “Calalus” mentioned specifically. The word of Septentrionalis caught my attention on the old 15th through 17th century maps along with Septem. Septentrionalis being a designation of the continent itself with Septimania being a designation of this land similar to “Western United States” that you might find on today’s maps and Septem.

IF the references to Septimania are not of this continent, then it could only be references to Septimania which is said to have existed in Southern France. The wiki writers tell an interesting tale as they so smoothly regurgitate the victor’s history.

Septimania (French: Septimanie, IPA: [sɛptimani]; Occitan: Septimània, IPA: [septiˈmanjɔ]; Catalan: Septimània, IPA: [səptiˈmaniə]) is a historical region in modern-day south of France. It referred to the western part of the Roman province of Gallia Narbonensis that passed to the control of the Visigoths in 462, when Septimania was ceded to their king, Theodoric II. Under the Visigoths it was known as simply Gallia or Narbonensis. Septimania territory roughly corresponds with the former administrative region of Languedoc-Roussillon that merged into the new administrative region of Occitanie. Septimania passed briefly to the Emirate of Córdoba, which had been expanding from the south during the eighth century before its subsequent conquest by the Franks, who by the end of the ninth century termed it Gothia or the Gothic March (Marca Gothica).

Septimania became a march of the Carolingian Empire and then West Francia down to the thirteenth century, though it was culturally and politically autonomous from northern France based central royal government. The region was under the influence of the people from the count territories of Toulouse, Provence, and ancient County of Barcelona. It was part of the wider cultural and linguistic region comprising the southern third of France known as Occitania. This area was finally brought under effective control of the French kings in the early 13th century as a result of the Albigensian Crusade after which it was assigned governors.

Sounds convincing, but why can’t I find ANY old map from the period of its supposed existence in southern France? All we find is cartographers of the present back 100 years with renditions that seem to come from… yes… nowhere. IF anyone can find me an OLD Credible map showing the existence of Septimania in southern France, or documentation indisputably showing by description, I would be very grateful and would be happy to change my profoundly subjective views. When I say old I mean, I would settle for a map from the era of its final supposed existence, and old historic record from original source that definitively describes what and where Septimania was.

A So called "old Map from 1902

Clearly it would seem that the Cartographers of the Netherlands were most informed of the very names in which the Tucson Artifacts seem to be about, why the Netherlands? The Netherlands is where the Frankish People expanded into after the “Fall of the Western Roman Empire.” These people were of the Carolingian Dynasty and who were they?

The Carolingian dynasty (known variously as the Carlovingians, Carolingus, Carolings or Karlings) was a Frankish noble family founded by Charles Martel with origins in the Arnulfing and Pippinid clans of the 7th century AD. The dynasty consolidated its power in the 8th century, eventually making the offices of mayor of the palace and dux et princeps Francorum hereditary, and becoming the de facto rulers of the Franks as the real powers behind the Merovingian throne. In 751 the Merovingian dynasty which had ruled the Germanic Franks was overthrown with the consent of the Papacy and the aristocracy, and a Carolingian Pepin the Short was crowned King of the Franks. The Carolingian dynasty reached its peak in 800 with the crowning of Charlemagne as the first Emperor of Romans in the West in over three centuries. His death in 814 began an extended period of fragmentation of the Carolingian empire and decline that would eventually lead to the evolution of the Kingdom of France and the Holy Roman Empire.

This is such an intertwined mess I am still trying to sort it out…
So how did the Welsh get into the mess? I’m still trying to figure that out but I suspect its beginnings had to do with one particular individual who was Prince Madoc’s 18th Great Grandfather, King Arthur himself.
(See Genealogy at the end)

King Arthur is viewed in the indoctrinated world as “Mythical,” a “fictional Character”, tell that to the Welsh. King Arthur was known for his antics in a place called Avalon, a pronunciation that would no doubt come out of the mouth of those who speak a language containing no Z. This is but a small part as to why I am certain that Avalon or Afalon is one and the same as Aztlan, and even Plato’s Atlan-tis.

One only need study the continuous conflicts in the early Roman Empire days, as they continuously rammed their religion of a hell fire breathing God down the peoples throat, with their “accept or die” motto. I once asked one of my devote Mexican/Aztec Catholic friends, “would you ever accept or join a religion that was forced upon you especially under the threat of death?
He was very quick to respond with “oh, absolutely not” To which I responded, “Please remind me how you and the whole of Mexico became Catholic?” I have never seen anyone with such a look of confusion and realization at one time.

I noticed on the old 16th century maps the name Calicuas, I had wondered if the original text on the Lead Crosses could be translated to “Calicuas or Calalus. I sent this information to those of the credentials and confirm my suspicions, as it would seem cuas is the plural Europeanized version of koa which means tribe or people, Cali-cuas being Cali tribe or people. If you have not followed this research that will mean nothing.

AFTER the “Fall of the Western Roman Empire”

About 300 years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire (about 476 AD) something fueled the fire once again. In approximately 775 AD the Romans under Theodorus or Theodoric I of Narbonne and was given the title of King of the Jews, and again the Romans set sail for Calalus, (Calicus) or what I believe was the actual Western Roman Empire. I’m not sure exactly what it was that caused this round of exploration and colonization.

“Theodoric I or Makir of Narbonne and Septimania was received by Charlemagne and was given the title "King of the Jews". His ancestry is possibly one of the greatest lineages of antiquity. Theodoric, claimed descent not only from the Merovingian Kings, but lineal descent from King David himself. Both the king and the Pope acknowledged this pedigree. Also called Makhir Natronai ben Habibi the Resh Galuta. Also called Rabbi Makir ha-David. Also called Dietrich. "The evidence is sketchy and muddled at this distance, but a persistent account of Theodoric I has it that he was the Jewish Exilarch in Narbonne, and that he succeeded in establishing a regionally autonomous Jewish-led state around Narbonne. Makhir has been identified as being Makhir Natronai, Resh Galuta in Baghdad, ousted from that position by a cousin in 771. If true, it would be a matter of considerable interest; the Baghdad Exilarchs were reputed to be lineal descendants of the ancient Hebrew King Daviid. What is fairly clear is that Septimania achieved an independent position in this era by some means or other, with the status of a Duchy or even possibly a Kingdom." He was sent by Haroun Al-Rashid, Calif of Baghdad to Charlemagne, King of the West at his request, who wanted to establish in Europe a middle class based on a Jewish nucleus between 786 and 793.”[1]

Although his decent from King David was possible, I would question Theodoric I’s claims, I suspect this had something to do with the reason that the Roman Jews suddenly seeking to return to the sacred land but needed a worthy ruler. He certainly was NOT of the Merovingian linage. I would suspect the Welsh decided it was time to follow in the footsteps of their ancient descendant, King Arthur. But it is more plausible that the Roman Jews returned to reclaim what had been lost a few hundred years earlier, and perhaps the Welsh just happened to show up or were in part of the group?.. What happened during the first colonization (100 BC to about 476 AD) that caused the Romans who arrived in this place as Romans only to return to Rome as Roman “Jews”? I have my suspicions…

According to the Catholic Jew, he writes;

In the fifth century Calalus was part of the Revived Western Empire of King Arthur a descendant of the Swan Knights. By the eighth century due to admixture with the American Indians the state had reverted to paganism. Nehemiah Theodorus led an expedition in 775 to return Calalus to Jewish and Roman rule. He conquered the ancient city of Rhoda and the Jewish law was restored. After 4 years in 779 AD Nehemiah Theodorus left Calalus for his kingdom in France which he had left in the hands of his brother Guillame de Gellone (Mar Nathan Kalonymus)[b.739 d.793 killed in the battle of Carcasonne). He then appointed a British Davidic Prince Jacob as the Jewish King of Calalus as regent for his young son Israel who was married to Jacob’s daughter. Jacob was a descendant of King Arthur as well as the Jewish Royal family of Bernicia. Jacob was the leader of the British Jewish settlers in Calalus. The Roman Jewish Settlers of Calalus in the 8th century were made up of two main groups – the Latin Jewish group from the Frankish Empire and the British Jewish group from the British Isles.

As it would seem by 880 AD Roman Jewish Rule took a turn when King Israel III (Brother of Rhodri Mawr, Possibly Gwriad Mawr) liberated the Toltec which didn’t go over so well with the Roman leadership as he was exiled. It would seem the majority of the Toltec followed him to central Mexico and he became their leader carrying properly the title of Quetzalcoatl, as he actually was a descendant of Quetzalcoatl, who is believed to be none other than Jesus of Nazareth. Israel III was likely following Jewish Tradition/belief in honoring the Sabbatical Year, every 7 years, a debt, even one of servitude, is forgiven.

In 844 Merfyn Frych left Wales for Septimania with his other children, leaving his son Mawr Jacob ha Rhodri as King of Gwynedd. He was known as Rhodri Mawr. Israel Merfyn returned to Calalus (which was called Manaan in Wales) and succeeded his father as Israel II. Israel III Septimus became King of Calalus in 858 at the age of 26. He fought many battles and later he granted the conquered pagan Tolteczas independence in 880. He was deposed by the Sanhedrin of Calalus and his son Israel IV replaced him and Israel III was banished. Israel IV began a campaign of war against the Tolteczas that would lead to the eventual end of the colony in the 10th century. The descendants of Israel III Septimus’ son Isaac became the Priest-Kings of the Toltecs who moved south to Mexico. They abolished the human sacrifices of the natives but they were restored (c.1018) after the Rhodans left America.

The actual genealogy of Prince Madoc is as follows, although there are other linages that can be followed through mother or father, this one that I chose reveals certain applicable interesting individuals.

Prince Madoc 1134-?
King Of Gwynedd Owain ap Gruffydd 1125-1170
Gruffydd ap Cynan 1055-1137
Cynan ap Iago 1035- ?
Iago ap Idwal ?-1039 (Suspect Topiltzin Quetzalcoatl)
Idwal ap Elisedd 975-?
Elisedd ap Meurig 945-? (Suspect Mixcoatl of the Toltec)
Meurig ap Idwal Foel 917-986
King of Gwynedd Iwal Foe lap Anararwd 883-942
King of the Britons Anarawd ap Rhodri 863-?
King Rhodri Mawr “The Great” ap Merfyn 820-878 (Brother of King of Rhoda and Septimania, Israel III and 1st leader of the liberated Toltec)
King of Gwynedd Merfyn Frych ap Grwiad 817-843 (Suspect Israel II)
King of Ynys Manaw Grwiad ap Elidir 755- (Suspect Israel I)
Cynan Dindaethwy ap Rhodri 738-816
Rhodri ap Idwal 690-754 (Molwynog “The Bald and Grey”)
Idwal Ywrch ap Cadwaladr 655-712
Cadwaladr Fendigaid ap Cadwallon 615-682
King Cadwallon ap Cadfan 591-634
King Cadfan ap Iago 569-625 - Wife Acha Afendreg Ddu ferch Cynan 575-660
King of Powys Cynan Garwyn 544-610 – Wife Gwenwynwyn Dalriada of Scotland 540-?
King Arthur Meriadoc King of Avalon 460-542
King of the Britons Uther Pendragon 440-520
King of Prydien Constintine Custennin Gradion 390-443
King of Bretagne Selyfan Salomon I 360-446
Gradion Mawr Erban 330-434
Cynan (Conanus) Meriadoc ap Gereint 305-367
Caradoc Gereint ap Eyndd ?-352
Eynudd Ednyfed Bretagne 250-328
King of the Silires Cwrrig FawGoric 215-250
Cwrrig Mawr ap Meirchion 130-215
Meirchion Fawr Filwr ap Owain, WIFE Unknown Ferch Aminadab
Aminadab ben Joshua 136-187
Grail King Joshua ben Joseph 84-159
Joseph Rama Theo Grail Child 30-99 (Josephus?)
Jesus the Christ & WIFE Mary Magdalene of the House of David

Lear More! Buy the Book! The Forbidden Histories of the Americas! 

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Ancient Exploration and colonization of the Americas

Many of you seekers of truth have heard the stories of Prince Madoc or Madog, the son of Owen ap Grufudd of Gwynedd, King of Wales 1137-1170, unconventional history tells of Prince Madoc who took sail with several ships in search of nothing more than an adventure…. but there is so much more to this story which we will come to shortly, and after this article, we still will not have even graced a small part nor ventured far enough back to the time the FIRST colonization’s which have occurred in the past on this continent with the exception of those first Americans, dating back even BEFORE King Solomon sent his friend, Hyrum, King of Tyre to the termed “mythical” place of Ophir.

Unlike the usual cry of fowl! Hoax! We generally find regarding unpopular history, today we find from the reliable[?] Wiki writers;
(Notice the choice of word by this Wiki writer which instead of denial, the article is more so apologetic)

The legends of Celtic voyages to America, and settlement there in the twelfth century, led by Madog (or Madoc), son of Owain Gwynedd, prince of Gwynedd, are generally dismissed, although such doubts are not conclusive. The Madog legend attained its greatest prominence during the Elizabethan era when Welsh and English writers used it bolster British claims in the New World versus those of Spain. The earliest surviving full account of Madoc's voyage, as the first to make the claim that Madoc had come to America, appears in Humphrey Llwyd 1559 Cronica Walliae, an English adaptation of the Brut y Tywysogion.[7] In 1810, John Sevier, the first governor of Tennessee, wrote to his friend Major Amos Stoddard about a conversation he had had in 1782 with the old Cherokee chief Oconostota concerning ancient fortifications built along the Alabama River.
The chief allegedly told him that the forts had been built by a white people called "Welsh", as protection against the ancestors of the Cherokee, who eventually drove them from the region.[8] Sevier had also written in 1799 of the alleged discovery of six skeletons in brass armor bearing the Welsh coat-of-arms. Thomas S. Hinde claimed that in 1799, six soldiers had been dug up near Jeffersonville, Indiana on the Ohio River with breastplates that contained Welsh coat of arms.[9] It is possible these were the same 6 Sevier referred to, as the number, brass plates and Welsh coat of arms are consistent with both references. Speculation abounds connecting Madog with certain sites, such as Devil's Backbone, located on the Ohio River at Fourteen Mile Creek near Louisville, Kentucky.[10][11]

7. Bradshaw, p. 29.
8."text of John Sevier's 1810 letter". Freepages.family.rootsweb.ancestry.com. Archived from the original on 13 January 2013. Retrieved 28 August 2017.
 9. The American pioneer: a monthly periodical, devoted to the objects of the Logan Historical Society; or, to collecting and publishing sketches relative to the early settlement and successive improvement of the country, Volume 1 (Google eBook) J. S. Williams., 1842
 10. "DNR: Outdoor Indiana - March/April 2011 - Featured Stories". In.gov. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
 11. "The Madoc legend lives in Southern Indiana: Documentary makers hope to bring pictures to author's work" Curran, Kelly (2009-01-08). News and Tribune, [Jeffersonville, Indiana]. Retrieved 2011-10-16.
 12. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2011-01-13. Retrieved 2013-11-03.

There is much more to this story but one needs to be careful with stories such as this, legends have a way of growing, added to until the truth of the matter is so badly tainted, it becomes unbelievable and near unrecognizable.

The above article although certainly not definitive of facts, I thought was well presented although I always love the choice of words used by the writers clearly demonstrating their belief in order to maintain their prized credibility.

What I am about to tell you is also short of the facts, and is presented as a plausibility, based on observation, common sense, and legend but not short of VERY compelling evidences. I would like also to point out to the serious searches of truth, when researching plausible truths, or unpopular hypothesis, always seek out the “original source material” rather than books about ancient history, written by someone 5 to 10 years ago, whose own bibliography lists only books written by some guy who wrote his book 5 to 10 years prior to the first and so on… The results of this type of research results in controlled conclusion to fit the orthodox belief, which is in my estimation suppressed or falsified history intentionally or not with a seeming agenda to keep the sheep from the truth. Understanding the magnitude of this seeming agenda, would shock most. The short of this statement is, there are some, who have almost always known the truth of this continent, and that truth is the very reasons why it is kept from you.

Not so Ancient Explorations and Colonization’s

Prince Madoc was at the near tail end of those who have frequented the Americas in the past, only to have been with or followed by Nights Templars and a few hundred years later, followed by the French and the Spanish. Prince Madoc is at the near end of the Genealogical line of those who have come long before him. Madoc was following a very old trail and knew for the most part, exactly what he was looking for and hoping to accomplish, and in comparison, to those he preceded, he failed miserably yet in another sense likely found great success. Do we really think that the Templars and/or Madoc were kicking up there heals, gathering in the golden wealth and chasing around the world all for the sake of the old wooden cup of a carpenter used by his own 31st Great Grandfather?

WHO HEREIN KNOWS, the true mission of the Templars of which they NEVER strayed from, had great success in, and even died for at the hand of the self-righteous?

The true seekers of knowledge in their quest for historical truth are familiar with the ancient battles and conquests of the Islamic Nations over Christian Nation, there has always been opposition and the battles rage on even today, and history repeats itself because the lusts for power do not change. Oppositions even exist within the two opposites. The so called “Holy” Roman Empire has this same ancient history in its quest to control the Christian and others who refused to be controlled, they who gave themselves this title were not so Holy and set themselves up as the rightful rulers of the world, the opposition within. They have done everything within their power to destroy the true linage of those with the rightful authority to rule. The bottom line here is, if a religion has a history of, or has or is being forced upon you, you have found Satan’s workshop and his followers rarely know it. Our own semi current history and foundation of the formation of the United States as we know it now is an example, prior to the conquest most do not understand, it was known after 1776 as the united states of America of the Free Republic (proper upper and lower case). After the conquest in 1862 it is now known as the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, or United States of America, the ingenious name of the Corporation, in order to keep you in the dark yet under control.

Ancient Exploration and colonization,
The Tucson Lead Artifact Discovery of 1924

This Holy Roman Empire was not any less deviant and active in their quest to control others in ancient times and an example of this can be found intertwined with orthodox history and artifacts discovered September 13th 1924 By Charles E. Manier of Tucson Arizona.

Of course like all controversial discoveries, it wasn’t long before someone claiming authority jumps in the middle crying hoax, the internet is full of the same regurgitated opinion of Professor Frank H Fowler, I won’t go into all of the anti-truth garbage now found on the internet, the sceptic hands work as well as mine…  However I will give the actual consensus by those who actually have the credentials to comment in this excerpt written by Tara Macisaac of The Epic Times concerning  Medieval Scholar Donald N. Yates Ph. D, and his recent book, the Tucson Artifacts, An Album of Photography.

Tucson Artifacts Suggest Romans Made It to
New World in 8th Century Expert

April 9, 2016 Updated: April 10, 2016
Medieval scholar Donald Yates, Ph.D., is shedding new light on controversial artifacts found near Tucson, Ariz., in the 1920s.

At least 32 cast-lead artifacts, many of them crosses, were excavated from compacted soil in the Santa Cruz River valley outside Tucson. The make of the artifacts and their inscriptions suggest a colony of the Holy Roman Empire existed in the area in 8th or 9th century A.D., Yates said.

Contact between the Old World and the New World is conventionally held to have first occurred with Viking expeditions around the 10th century A.D. Suggestions of contact before this date—and the Tucson artifacts are not the only artifacts hailed as indications this was the case—have long been dismissed by mainstream historians.

Holy Roman Hoax?

The Tucson artifacts have been decried as fake. But Yates says no one with the proper credentials to assess them has called them a hoax.

On the contrary, Byron Cummings, who was the founder of the classics program and archaeology at the University of Arizona; and Neil Judd, who headed the Smithsonian’s excavations at Chaco Canyon, believed them genuine.

“To make that decision, you have to have credentials in certain areas—in Medieval Latin and paleography (the study of ancient manuscripts) and epigraphy, which is the study of inscriptions,” Yates said.

“I’m a classicist, I have a Ph.D. in classical studies specializing in Medieval Latin and paleography. I have a whole row of publications in that very, very tiny specialized area.”

He said another uniquely qualified person to study the artifacts was Wake Forest University Professor Cyclone Covey in the 1970s. “His position was always … [that] there’s nothing phony about them,” Yates said.

You can also read much more from those who have no agenda here… https://outline.com/t2CqcC

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

The Forbidden Histories of the Americas BOOK

Hello everyone! The long awaited book The Forbidden Histories of the Americas is finally ready!

Over 500 Pages at a full 1 1/2 inches thick, with hundreds of photos!

Order yours now at  AMAZON

Sunday, January 6, 2019

Books for Sale

The Treasures of Utah

Hard Copy Limited number of Copies left

 send PayPal payment to crickett4@gmail.com
Send via: venmo to crickett4@gmail.com Amy Crockett Lowe

(for all books)
If you’re looking for a nice uninvolved book to read as you slowly drift off at day’s end, you've got the wrong book.  If you, by some chance, do doze off… you’ve got the wrong mindset.  Should you choose to indulge, be mindful because you’re not merely reading a fascinating new book, you’re embarking on a full fledged post-graduate college course that could and should be the most involved and thrilling of your life and will remain with you throughout it.  Were you to encounter your professor on the street or at the mall, you’d pass him off as a middle aged ruffian or a Hippie wannabe who’s probably spent a good portion of his life on a Harley roaming aimlessly along the American Highways. You’d be dead wrong as so many are when it comes to Daniel Lowe.  Daniel is a (the) veritable encyclopedia of ancient American archaeology / history.  More than that, he is a comrade and mentor; yet he’s an instant and loyal friend......


Nephite North

Hard Copies Sold Out
available in * PDF format $15.00

contact tuscoro@gmail.com
OR send PayPal payment to crickett4@gmail.com
*Soft Back Version (Coming Soon)
*Hard Back Version SOLD OUT

I read Daniel’s book as a favor for a friend. Little did I know that it would give me a whole different perspective on a lot of things. I grew up in Kansas in a Catholic family. I had already found that the Bible actually differs with Catholic dogma and doctrine. Still, the Bible refers to several things which I have wondered about. In Daniel’s book I find a few answers which I would have never have pondered. I am referring to the firmament in the sky and the size of some human skeletons. (Some were found in my area.) These have been blips on the radar screen of my insurmountable topics of study until now. Daniel gives a clear “theory” or hypothesis which makes their explanation plausible. Daniel gives compelling evidence also for “BC North”. Indeed, if early monuments at archaeological digs can be found to point to a solstice sunrise, he may very well be onto a great discovery which will set the archaeological community on its ear.


The Forbidden Histories of the Americas

Hard Copy Available soon

Since the time of the Italian explorer Christopher Columbus the man credited for the discovery of the new world, the new comers to the world have observed and documented the things which they seen, heard and experienced. The new comers to this world saw the ruins of what appeared as intricately built ancient cities, observed strange yet familiar habits of the indigenous. It wasn't until the mid 19th century that archaeology was even taken serious in this land, yet it would seem as though it was not for the purpose of documentation and understanding of those of the past. 100 years or so earlier Sir Richard Colt Hoare coined the motto for Antiquarianism in Europe, We Speak from Facts not Theory and it would seem here in the Americas, John W Powell and Ephraim George Squire after the creation of the Smithsonian Institution, together reconstructed and change the purpose of the existence of Smithsonian with what would seem to be their motto, We Speak from Theory not from Facts.


Thursday, December 27, 2018

Who Really Discovered America? Part TWO

The Imperial Library of Constantinople

The Imperial Library of Constantinople would have been the equivalency to the Greek and Romans, of our Library of Congress with just a touch of the Smithsonian ideals… Borrowed from the great Wiki, we find…

The Imperial Library of Constantinople, in the capital city of the Byzantine Empire, [Where the Parrot was named 1000 years before it was known] was the last of the great libraries of the ancient world. Long after the destruction of the Great Library of Alexandria and the other ancient libraries, it preserved the knowledge of the ancient Greeks and Romans for almost 1,000 years. A series of unintentional fires over the years and wartime damage, including the raids of the Fourth Crusade in 1204, impacted the building itself and its contents. The library continued in substantial form until the city of Constantinople was conquered by the Ottoman Empire [Muslims] on 29 May 1453 when the library's considerable surviving contents were destroyed or lost. [or Relocated Prior to Intentionally setting fire to it] The library was founded by Constantius II [second Son of Constantine the Great] (reigned 337–361 AD) who established a Scriptorium so that the surviving works of Greek literature could be copied for preservation. The Emperor Valens in 372 employed four Greek and three Latin calligraphers. The majority of Greek classics known today are known through Byzantine copies originating from the Imperial Library of Constantinople.

In ancient Greece the written word and most literature was transcribed onto papyrus. As the papyrus began to deteriorate, there was a movement to transfer the reading material from papyrus to parchment as did Constantine the Great, around the 4th century, but his movement specifically concerned Holy Scripture. [But more believable, the documents and maps pertaining to the new world discovered in the archives of India and records of expeditions of the last 500 years] Constantine's heir to the throne Constantius II continued this movement. It was his work that culminated in the first Imperial Library of Constantinople. The library is estimated to have contained well over 100,000 volumes of ancient text. The movement was headed by one Themistios, who commanded a group of calligraphers and librarians. [that’s Librarians, not Iberians, Librarians actually existed…]

Over the centuries, several fires in the Library of Constantinople destroyed much of the collection. [Or so it is said] The library was burnt in the year 473 and about 120,000 volumes were lost. However, the attempts of Themistios and Constantius were not fruitless, as some works were saved and recopied and circulated through other texts. Consequently, modern knowledge of Classical Greek literature is greater than would be the case if not for their efforts.

After the fall of Constantinople on 12 April 1204, the library was allegedly destroyed by the Franks and Venetians [Italy] of the Fourth Crusade during the sacking of the city. [This would explain why France was seemingly fallen from the good graces and obviously lacking in their expeditions in the years to come, lacking knowledge of the heart of this new world, yet the Spanish and Portuguese seem to excel, this was an intentional burning after important documents, maps, etc. were removed] Donald Queller notes that while some manuscripts were probably lost in the three fires that ravaged the city during the attack by the crusaders, there is no indication of the continued existence of a formal imperial library at the time and no source mentions lost manuscripts.

While there were many reports of texts surviving into the Ottoman era, no substantive portion of the library has ever been recovered. Professor Carlyle was provided access in 1800 to the Seraglio, the supposed repository of post-Ottoman conquest surviving texts, but no texts from the Imperial Library were located. A notable exception is the Archimedes Palimpsest, that surfaced in 1840, was translated in 1915 and was unaccountably found in a private collection and sold in 1998. [Imagine that, what are the odds?]

If I could I would look in the Archives of Seville and Madrid not to mention and most likely the Vatican, but this is when the ancient old denial tactics of the modern Smithsonian come into play… “What Maps and exploration documents from 100 BC to 1000 AD?

Why would I suspect the Vatican? Well let’s just say in those times and even today, they seem to be the inspiration for the Smithsonian and their hide, destroy and deny tactics.

Now I may not have all the details and may even be off a bit or even a lot for that matter, and I am certain the delusionist would jump on board to work hard to defuse this concept in the name of diffusion, but it seems to me that at the time of the sacking of the city of Constantinople, a majority of the records were moved away with France along with Italy playing along, the records likely made their way to the Vatican, despite their differences, other than the Muslins who was going to wage war on the Vatican?

The primary records and maps and the real history of the Roman Empire, the Greek, Indo Greek, and knowledge of the lands the many divisions of power coveted in this medieval times, would be safe to a large degree in Italy under the Catholic eye. If you were not in the good graces of the Holy Roman Emperors and those who controlled the information contained within you would not have access. What makes it so difficult to put this all together is the lack of information other than what has been passed down, it all seems to follow where the leading crown and Catholic rule was at the time or the old adage, follow the money..

Fall of the Western Empire of Rome

The “Fall of the Western Empire of Rome” near 500 AD, does not necessarily mean what you may think? The historians would have you thinking that this was at a time where in control of what is now Spain, France and even Italy was lost, but the West went much further west than any one supposed. The true west in this appellation of Western Empire was across the west sea, the Americas. After the Rule of the Muslims, 775AD of the period of Septimania the West rose again quietly. For the next 200 plus years the Romans are establish again in Calalus (Calicuas).

In the late 15th Century Spain was clearly in better relations with Rome as per the history suggests, this would explain why France seemed to target the upper eastern coast Iceland/Greenland approach to the Americas, using much older documents, whereas the Spanish went nearly straight for the heart of all that was coveted in the new world in Mexico and pushing North. Clearly both parties were operating on different documents or from different time frames.

 In 218 BC the Romans invaded the Iberian peninsula, which later became the Roman province of Hispania (which later evolved into "España", the Spanish word for Spain). The Romans introduced the Latin language, the ancestor of both modern-day Spanish and the Italian). The Iberian peninsula remained under Roman rule for over 600 years, until the collapse of the Western-Roman Empire. [Approx. 500 AD]

In the Early modern period, [1494] until the 18th century, southern and insular Italy came under Spanish control, having been previously a domain of the Crown of Aragon.

The Renaissance Period

1494 is an interesting date for sure, but what was it that caused a series of renaissance outbreaks at the time? What was it that brought on the jealousy of France and causing King Charles the VIII of France to suddenly invade the Italian peninsula and occupied the Kingdom of Naples with the poor excuse of “on the ground of a dynastic claim” a NEAR 250 Year old issue? Maybe I didn't understand this… According to the wise old WIKI, it is said that “An Italic League that ensured peace in the peninsula for 50 years had collapsed in 1492 with the death of Lorenzo De Medici, key figure in the bloc and ruler of Florence.” His son Piero the Unfortunate takes over his father’s position. It’s just my opinion but I think if you look a tad bit closer, you might find a coincidental reason that Charles kicked up his heals…

Lorenzo De Medici I think had more responsibility that what wiki implies, I think it was his responsibility to ensure equalization on current historic events, but his luck ran out when he died in April of 1492. As it would seem, a fantastic event soon took place based upon a sharing of documents and maps, Columbus is reported as to having discovered, or should I say RE-discovered the former Western Roman Empire interests! Columbus returns and informs Spain of the news in early 1493. Was this top secret information? Was it supposed to have been shared among the participants of the Renaissance period? I don’t know but it would seem to me that King Charles VIII was not happy about something, and he sets out for Italy NOT because his great great grandpa and then some, Charles the 1st got his butt kicked some 250 years earlier losing the Isle of Sicily and his control over it as wiki tells is the reason on one page but tells another conflicting story on another page... but he heads to Florence where Piero di Lorenzo de' Medici lives, the son of the former Lorenzo de' Medici, you know, the new ruler in Florence and keeper of the peace? But why would King Charles go to him? Why Florence? It would seem there is another individual (Tosconelli) living in Florence at the time who was sending Columbus letters telling him certain privy information regarding a shorter route to the Americas! I wonder where Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli the astrologer gleaned his information from.

Wiki says: When Charles arrives in Florence...

Piero attempted to stay neutral, but this was unacceptable to Charles, who intended to invade Tuscany. Piero attempted to mount a resistance, but received little support from members of Florentine elites who had fallen under the influence of the fanatical Dominican priest Girolamo Savonarola; even his cousins defected to Charles's side.

Piero quickly gave up as Charles's army neared Florence and surrendered the chief fortresses of Tuscany to the invading army, giving Charles everything he demanded.

I’m left wondering what it was that King Charles VIII of the French demanded. No matter Charles apparently got what he wanted and the French soon put together their own Explorations to the new world. It would seem however Piero gave older information based on the route the French took rather than the route sent to Columbus from Toscanelli.

Charles VIII died in 1498 taking with him what he knew, and it would be another 25 plus years before the French was able to get into the game.

What else do the maps show?

As evidence in support of the French being singled out on updated information not only based upon the route they chose 20 some odd years after, but one such incident in history sticks out for me. The French and Italy had their ups and downs for some time, I’m sure this slowed them up a bit too. If one takes a look at all the early maps of the Americas one can see the lack of information regarding certain geographic areas, especially here in the west, it seems the French had “the lack of” information, case in point, the French Moll Map.

What exactly inspire Herman Moll a late 1600’s early 1700’s Cartographer and engraver we may never know, but the one map that catches my attention is his 1715 map wherein he incorporates the Baron Lahontan’s map of Lahontan’s account of the Long River, however there are two editions, in one version he uses Lahontan’s seeming poor rendition of the Lake at the head of this Long River, the other Moll uses what appears to be very nice a rendition from unknown origins. Without going back to read his account, if memory serves me, Lahontan claims the Indians somewhere near the Missouri and Mississippi river junction told him of this large lake at the head of this Long River and about the people who lived around it. This no doubt is the same Lake the Spanish wrote of several times over and depicted on their maps with what I would call great accuracy, but how would I know this if none of them including Lahontan never found this elusive lake?

Moll himself states on the map “A great part of this map is taken from original draughts of Mr. Blackmore, the ingenious Mr. Berisford, Captain Nairn and others never before published” What other maps was he talking about? The image he uses for the lake at the end of this long river which Lahontan never made it to, is a near perfect rendition of the intended lake at its higher elevations. How would I know this? We’ll get to that. But the point here is that it is clear to me that he was using older information that could only have come from maps or information with origins prior to about 900 AD which is likely the last time the lake was seen at this higher level reveling its very identifiable arm or bay to the east.

Now what I am about to tell you is one of those things which I have kept back in most of my writings and it is concerning this lake and the Long River. It is virtually unknown and I know no other who has heard this nor considered it. To explain myself would require going back over nearly all of my writings, if you have not followed them then you are welcome to, if you have and have not picked up on the details yet, I do apologize for writing so tight lipped in the past.

The reason I have taken notice of Lahontan’s Long River story is that the Indians could not have told him about this lake as he claimed they did, Lahontan was clearly carrying information dating back prior to 900 AD. I say this because, prior to 900 AD back to the time of the Crucifixion and possibly earlier, the lake in which Scientist claim is 33 Million years old referred to as Lake Uinta, Takes the appearance of how it would have looked in its earliest times, some even say it existed 50 Million years ago. However looking at this rendition of this lake of which there is very little information regarding it, you likely would likely not consider it as a candidate of the elusive Lake Copala. This lake existed 2000 years ago and likely earlier until about 900 AD when a very large earthquake hit the Utah area, this is likely the earthquake responsible for what geologists call the Colorado Plateau uplift.

Despite what geologist will tell you pertaining to these Colorado Mountains, “at least” the northern parts, did not exist in the days of lake Copala’s early days, it drained in two effluents, one to the south now regarded as the Green River and eventually joining the Colorado River, and it drained to the East and was at that time the head waters of what is now the Missouri River. At this early point of the Lakes Existence is the only time it would have taken upon the appearance shown in Herman Molls map, where did he get this from? In those days it was a beautiful lush and tropical area. There is one other little secret, in these days when the river drained to the east out of the Uinta Basin, the river was known by the indigenous as Sidon, from this lake and all the way to the Gulf Coast. Sidon was the primary river of which fed the lower portion of Mississippi River, it was the predominant river. Today we see the Mississippi all the way north as the main river as by all rights it now is…

In about 900 AD there was an uplift of which geologist say 20 million years ago,  it lifted the near entire state of Utah which is consider the Colorado Plateau. This event cut off a large part of the source waters that fed this enormous lake, not to mention sent a wall of water south carving out another 1000 feet of the Grand Canyon. At least the Northern parts of Colorado rose up and cut off the head drainage of the upper regions of what was known in BC times as Sidon. The Missouri was no longer the primary feed of the lower portion of today’s Mississippi river. The altering of the course of the river is plain to see even today, East and North East of St. Louis. The river today flows to the east of Saint Louis but on the west of East St. Louis, before this, the river flowed on the east side of East St. Louis with its east bank at Caseyville. There was a well know ancient city known by certain circles in the days of Sidon, known to exist on the west side of this once great river, today its ruins are on the east side which might explain why they have not yet found it.

After this great event of 900 AD and the dust settled, the once beautiful Lake, surrounded by 7 Cities now in ruin, was all but gone. Over the next 100 years what was once a lush beautiful tropic environment, began its transformation to high country desert.

Why is it I seem so confident of this hypothesis? Because I took the time to consider what others would not let their mind set venture beyond. Despite the flawed Radio Carbon Dating System and those who believe the Uinta Mountains were once covered in an ice sheet from not only an Ice age, but a second one. This lake did not exist 50 million years ago, not even 33 million years ago, not even 1 million years ago. The Uinta Mountains didn’t exist even 5000 years ago.

Again, who discovered America? It sure wasn’t Columbus and the evidences show this land was known in the old world by some, as far back as King David if not earlier. Atlan, Atlan-tis, Avalon, Aztlan, think about it. Just you wait till I write about Shambala… I’ll bet those who took the time to read this is now wondering where did all that water come from let alone, where did it go? but don’t you worry none little buckaroo, it is going to happen again… Isaiah 41:18