The Imperial Library of Constantinople
The
Imperial Library of Constantinople would have been the equivalency to the Greek
and Romans, of our Library of Congress with just a touch of the Smithsonian
ideals… Borrowed from the great Wiki, we find…
The
Imperial Library of Constantinople, in the capital city of the Byzantine Empire, [Where the Parrot was named 1000 years before it
was known by Columbus ] was
the last of the great libraries of the ancient world. Long after the
destruction of the Great Library of Alexandria
and the other ancient libraries, it preserved the knowledge of the ancient
Greeks and Romans for almost 1,000 years. A series of unintentional
fires over the years and wartime damage, including the raids of the
Fourth Crusade in 1204, impacted the building itself and its contents. The
library continued in substantial form until the city of Constantinople was
conquered by the Ottoman Empire [Muslims] on 29
May 1453 when the library's considerable surviving contents were
destroyed or lost. [Or Relocated Prior
to intentionally setting fire to it] The library
was founded by Constantius II [second Son of Constantine the Great] (reigned
337–361 AD) who established a Scriptorium so that the surviving works of [Indo-]Greek
literature [Informational Spoils and Records of the Conquest of India which began
as early as 326 BC by Alexander the Great] could be copied for
preservation. The Emperor Valens in 372 employed four Greek and three Latin
calligraphers. The majority of Greek classics known today are known through
Byzantine copies originating from the Imperial Library of Constantinople .
In
ancient Greece
the written word and most literature was transcribed onto papyrus. As the
papyrus began to deteriorate, there was a movement to transfer the reading
material from papyrus to parchment as did Constantine the Great, around the 4th
century, but his movement specifically concerned Holy Scripture. [But more believable, the documents and maps
pertaining to the new world discovered in the archives of India and
records of expeditions of the last 500 years]Constantine 's heir to the throne Constantius II continued this
movement. It was his work that culminated in the first Imperial Library of Constantinople . The library is estimated to have
contained well over 100,000 volumes of ancient text. The movement was headed by
one Themistios, who commanded a group of calligraphers and librarians.[that’s Librarians, not Iberians, Librarians actually
existed…]
Over
the centuries, several fires in the Library of Constantinople
destroyed much of the collection. [Or
so it is said] The library was burnt in the year 473 and about
120,000 volumes were lost.[what a convenient time for this loss after
loosing control in the Americas and being expelled, with every intention of
returning some day] However, the attempts of Themistios and
Constantius were not fruitless, as some works were saved and recopied and
circulated through other texts. Consequently, modern knowledge of Classical
Greek literature is greater than would be the case if not for their efforts.
After
the fall of Constantinople on 12 April 1204, [Another
convenient time for the loss of records, just after being defeated again in the
Americas ] the library was allegedly destroyed by
the Franks and Venetians [Italy ] of the Fourth Crusade during the sacking of the
city. [This would explain why
France was seemingly fallen from the good graces and obviously lacking in their
expeditions in the years to come, lacking knowledge of the heart of this new
world, yet the Spanish and Portuguese seem to excel, this was an intentional
burning after important documents, maps, etc. were removed] Donald Queller notes that while some manuscripts
were probably lost in the three fires that ravaged the city
during the attack by the crusaders, there is no indication of the continued
existence of a formal imperial library at the time and no source
mentions lost manuscripts.
While there
were many reports of texts surviving into the Ottoman era, no substantive
portion of the library has ever been recovered. Professor Carlyle was
provided access in 1800 to the Seraglio, the supposed repository of
post-Ottoman conquest surviving texts, but no texts from the Imperial
Library were located. A notable exception is the Archimedes Palimpsest, which
surfaced in 1840, was translated in 1915 and was unaccountably found
in a private collection and sold in 1998. [Imagine that, what are the odds?]
If I could I would look in the Archives of Seville and
Madrid not to mention and most likely the Vatican , but
this is when the ancient old denial tactics of the modern Smithsonian come into
play… “What Maps and exploration documents from 100 BC to 1000 AD?”
Why
would I suspect the Vatican ?
Well let’s just say in those times and even today, they seem to be the inspiration
for the Smithsonian and their hide, destroy and deny tactics.
Now
I may not have all the details and may even be off a bit or even a lot for that
matter, and I am certain the delusionist would jump on board to work hard
to defuse this concept in the name of diffusion,
but it seems to me that at the time of the sacking of the city of
Constantinople, a majority of the records were moved away with France along
with Italy playing along, the records likely made their way to the Vatican,
despite their differences, who was going to wage war on the Vatican? Not even
the Muslims would come against their creator of Islam.
The
primary records and maps and the real history of the Roman Empire, the Greek,
Indo Greek, and knowledge of the lands the many divisions of power coveted in
this medieval times, would be safe to a large degree in Italy under the
Catholic eye. If you were not in the good graces of the Holy Roman Emperors and
those who controlled the information contained within, you would not have
access. What makes it so difficult to put this all together is the lack of
information other than what has been passed down, it all seems to follow where
the leading crown and Catholic rule was at the time or the old adage, follow
the money..
Fall of the Western Empire of Rome
The “Fall of the Western Empire
of Rome” near 500 AD, does not necessarily mean what you may think? The
historians would have you thinking that this was at a time where in control of
what is now Spain, France and even Italy was lost, but the West went much
further west than any one supposed. The true west in this appellation of Western
Empire was across the west sea, the Americas . After the Rule of the
Muslims, 775AD of the period of Septimania the West rose again quietly. For the
next 200 plus years the Romans are established again in Calalus (Calicuas).
In
the late 15th Century Spain was clearly in better relations
with Rome as per the history suggests, this would explain why France seemed to
target the upper eastern coast Iceland/Greenland approach to the Americas,
using much older documents, whereas the Spanish went nearly straight for the
heart of all that was coveted in the new world in Mexico and pushing North.
Clearly both parties were operating on different documents or from different
time frames.
In
218 BC the Romans invaded the Iberian Peninsula, which later became the Roman province of Hispania
(which later evolved into "España", the Spanish word for Spain ). The
Romans introduced the Latin language, the ancestor of both modern-day Spanish
and the Italian). The Iberian Peninsula
remained under Roman rule for over 600 years, until the
collapse of the Western-Roman Empire. [Approx. 500 AD]
In the Early modern period, [1494] until the 18th century, southern and insular Italy came under Spanish control, having been
previously a domain of the Crown of Aragon .
The Renaissance Period
1494
is an interesting date for sure, but what was it that caused a series of
renaissance outbreaks at the time? What was it that brought on the jealousy of France and causing King Charles the VIII of
France to suddenly invade the Italian peninsula and occupied the Kingdom of Naples with the poor excuse of “on
the grounds of a dynastic claim” a NEAR 250 Year old issue? Maybe I didn't
understand this… According to the wise old WIKI, it is said that “An
Italic League that ensured peace in the peninsula for 50 years
had collapsed in 1492 with the death of Lorenzo De Medici, key figure in the
bloc and ruler of Florence .” His
son Piero the Unfortunate takes over his father’s position. It’s just my
opinion but I think if you look a tad bit closer, you might find a coincidental
reason that Charles kicked up his heals…
Lorenzo
De Medici I think had more responsibility that what wiki implies, I think it
was his responsibility to ensure equalization on current historic events, but
his luck ran out when he died in April of 1492. As it would seem, a fantastic
event soon took place based upon a sharing of documents and maps, Columbus is reported as to having discovered, or should I
say RE-discovered the former Western Roman Empire
interests! Columbus returns and informs Spain of the news
in early 1493. Was this top secret information? Was it supposed to have been
shared among the participants of the Renaissance period? I don’t know but it
would seem to me that King Charles VIII was not happy about something, and he
sets out for Italy NOT because his great great grandpa and then some, Charles
the 1st got his butt kicked some 250 years earlier losing the Isle of
Sicily and his control over it as wiki tells is the reason on one page, but
tells another conflicting story on another page... but he heads to Florence
where Piero di Lorenzo de' Medici lives, the son of the former Lorenzo de' Medici, you know, the new ruler in
Florence and keeper of the peace? But why would King Charles go to him? Why Florence ? It would seem
there is another individual (Tosconelli) living in Florence
at the time who was sending Columbus letters
telling him certain privy information regarding a shorter route to the Americas ! I
wonder where Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli the astrologer gleaned his information
from.
Wiki
says: When Charles arrives in Florence ...
Piero
attempted to stay neutral, but this was unacceptable to Charles, who intended
to invade Tuscany .
Piero attempted to mount a resistance, but received little support from members
of Florentine elites who had fallen under the influence of the fanatical
Dominican priest Girolamo Savonarola; even his cousins defected to Charles's
side.
Piero
quickly gave up as Charles's army neared Florence and surrendered the chief
fortresses of Tuscany to the invading army, giving Charles everything he
demanded.
I’m
left wondering what it was that King Charles VIII of the French demanded. No matter,
Charles apparently got what he wanted and the French soon put together their
own Explorations to the new world. It would seem however Piero gave older
information based on the route the French took rather than the route sent to Columbus from Toscanelli.
Charles
VIII died in 1498 taking with him what he knew, and it would be another 25 plus
years before the French was able to get into the game.
What else do the maps show?
As evidence in support of the French being singled out
on updated information not only based upon the route they chose 20 some odd
years after, but one such incident in history sticks out for me. The French and
Italy
had their ups and downs for some time, I’m sure this slowed them up a bit too.
If one takes a look at all the early maps of the Americas one can see the lack of
information regarding certain geographic areas, especially here in the west, it
seems the French had “the lack of” information, case in point, the French Moll
Map.
What
exactly inspire Herman Moll a late 1600’s early 1700’s Cartographer and
engraver we may never know, but the one map that catches my attention is his
1715 map wherein he incorporates the Baron Lahontan’s map of Lahontan’s account
of the Long River, however there are two editions, in one version he uses
Lahontan’s seeming poor rendition of the Lake at the head of this Long River,
the other Moll Map uses what appears to be very nice a rendition from unknown
origins showing conditions that had not existed for at least 800 years but
likely 1700 years! Without going back to read his account, if memory serves me,
Lahontan claims the Indians somewhere near the Missouri and Mississippi river
junction told him of this large lake at the head of this Long River and about
the people who lived around it. This no doubt is the same Lake the Spanish
wrote of several times over and depicted on their maps with what I would call
great accuracy, but how would I know this if none of them including Lahontan
never found this elusive lake?
Moll
himself states on the map “A great part of this map is taken from original
draughts of Mr. Blackmore, the ingenious Mr. Berisford, Captain Nairn and others never before published”
What other maps was he talking about? The image he uses for the lake at the end
of this long river which Lahontan never made it to, is a near perfect rendition
of the intended lake at its higher elevations. How would I know this? We’ll get
to that. But the point here is that it is clear to me that he was using older
information that could only have come from maps or information with origins
prior to about 900 AD which is likely the last time the lake was seen at this
higher level reveling its very identifiable arm or bay to the east.
and Two)
FINDING THE LEGENDARY LAKE COPALA
Now
what I am about to tell you is one of those things which I have kept back in
most of my writings and it is concerning this lake and the Long River .
It is virtually unknown and I know no other who has heard this nor considered
it. To explain myself would require going back over nearly all of my writings,
if you have not followed them then you are welcome to, if you have and have not
picked up on the details yet, I do apologize for writing so tight lipped in the
past.
The
reason I have taken notice of Lahontan’s Long River story is that the Indians
could not have told him about this lake as he claimed they did, Lahontan was
clearly carrying information dating back prior to 900 AD. I say this because,
prior to 900 AD back to the time of the Crucifixion and possibly earlier, the
lake in which Scientist claim is 33 Million years old referred to as Lake
Uinta, Takes the appearance of how it would have looked in its earliest times,
some even say it existed 50 Million years ago, yeah... I remember my first beer... However looking at this
rendition of this lake of which there is very little information regarding it,
you would likely not consider it as a candidate of the elusive Lake Copala .
This lake existed 2000 years ago and likely earlier until about 900 AD when a
very large earthquake hit the Utah
area; this is likely the earthquake responsible for what geologists call the
Colorado Plateau uplift, Geologists claim it was formed some 20 to 70 Million
years ago… I wish they would make up their mind...
Despite
what geologist will tell you pertaining to these Colorado Mountains, “at least”
the northern parts, did not exist in the days of lake Copala’s early days, it
drained in two effluents (Not necessarily
at the same time), one to the south now regarded as the Green River and
eventually joining the Colorado River, and it drained to the East and was at
that time the head waters of what is now the Missouri River. At this early
point of the Lakes Existence is the only time it would have taken upon the
appearance shown in Herman Molls map, where did he get this from? In those days
it was a beautiful lush and tropical area. There is one other little secret, in
these days when the river drained to the east out of the Uinta
Basin , the river was known by the
indigenous as Sidon ,
from this lake and all the way to the Gulf Coast .
Sidon was the primary river of which fed the
lower portion of Mississippi River , it was the
predominant river prior to the destruction at the time of the crucifixion.
Today we see the Mississippi
all the way north as the main river as by all rights it today now is…
In about 900 AD there was an uplift of which geologist
say it occurred 20 million years ago, it lifted the near entire
state of Utah
which is consider the Colorado Plateau. This event cut off a large part of the
source waters that fed this enormous lake, not to mention sent a wall of water
south carving out another 1000 feet of the already existing Grand
Canyon . At least the Northern parts of Colorado
rose up and cut off the head drainage of the upper regions of what was known in
BC times as Sidon .
The Missouri was no longer the primary feed of
the lower portion of today’s Mississippi river .
The altering of the course of the river is plain to see even today, East and
North East of St. Louis. The river today flows to the east of Saint
Louis but on the west of East
St. Louis . Before this, the river flowed on the east
side of East St. Louis
with its east bank at Caseyville. There was a well know ancient city known by
certain circles in the days of Sidon, known to exist on the west side of this
once great river, today its ruins are on the east side which might explain why
they have not yet found it across from Nauvoo Illinois.
After
this great event of 900 AD and the dust settled, the once beautiful Lake , surrounded by 7 Cities now in ruin, was all but
gone. Over the next 100 years what was once a lush beautiful tropic
environment, began its transformation to the high country desert that it is
today.
Why
is it I seem so confident of this hypothesis? Because I took the time to
consider what others would not let their mind set venture beyond. Despite the
flawed Radio Carbon Dating System and those who believe the Uinta
Mountains were once covered in an ice sheet from not only one Ice
age, but a second one. This lake did not exist 50 million years ago, not even
33 million years ago, not even 1 million years ago. The Uinta
Mountains didn’t exist even 5000 years ago.
Again,
who discovered America ?
It sure wasn’t Columbus
and the evidences show this land was known in the old world by some, as far
back as King David if not earlier. Atlan, Atlan-tis, Avalon, and Aztlan, think
about it. Just you wait till I write about Shambahla…or more accurately
Shem-Bahla (Hindi, Children of Shem)
I’ll bet those who took the time to read this is now wondering where did all
that water come from let alone, where did it go? but don’t you worry none
little buckaroo, it is going to happen again… Isaiah 41:18
Who wants to talk about Corn? .....
Who wants to talk about Corn? .....