And those who promote it…
“They” are free to believe as they will…
“They” will find exactly what they seek…
Even if it is a lie…
The original article reads 10,000 years, but whose counting
right?
NOTE: My articles are not written
with the intent to persuade anyone nor convince them of the errors of their
ways, ALL shall remain as theory until proven with facts, I do not care what
others think or believe, man has a God given right, whether they believe in a God
or not, to believe as they choose… Agency, it belongs to all, even if they
“choose” not to use it, or use it poorly…
“As for me and my house, we shall
serve the Lord.”
The backbone of the theory of evolution…
Charles Darwin proposed the theory of
universal common descent through an evolutionary process in his book On the
Origin of Species in 1859, saying, "Therefore I should infer from analogy
that probably all the organic beings
which have ever lived on this earth have descended from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed."
An interesting choice of words, What did Charles actually
mean? I often wonder if this Christian was grossly misunderstood, his words
twisted, could he have meant this “one
premortal form” alluding to a God? Why would he say, “into which life was first breathed" if his
intent did not include a God in the equation of life, why didn’t he say, “when
life first breathed”?
Someday, maybe I will read his book to discover his true meaning…
Evil-ution, I just can’t seem to spell that
correctly… is in part today described as:
“Evolution is change in the heritable
characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary
processes give rise to biodiversity at every level of biological
organisation, including the levels of species, individual organisms, and
molecules.”
What they do not see and never will, is that the
God process also gives that same rise, but also gave them the ability
to write the above statement, I would like to see “Natural Selection” do that. Continuing on…
“All life on Earth shares a common
ancestor known as the last universal common ancestor (LUCA), which lived
approximately 3.5–3.8 billion years ago,
although a study in 2015
found "remains of biotic life" from 4.1 billion years ago in ancient
rocks in Western Australia. In July 2016, scientists reported identifying a set
of 355 genes from the LUCA of all organisms living on Earth.”(from the all
knowing Wiki)
I suppose God may have lived 3.5-3.8
“billion’ years ago, but I can’t help but wonder how he might feel about being
called the “last universal common
ancestor” by his descendants 3.5 billion years later and by those who were
not there… and Thank Goodness! For “a
Study” when ever you see this noble announcement of reference, you can now
rest assured and with all certainty know without any degree of original
thought, intelligence, doubt in any form or any thought whatsoever, believe... that what is to follow… is gospel… just shut
up, ask no question and believe… because… “they”... lets have a drum roll.... have done A Study!! Wow, I have chills running up and down my spine. It must
be that “Evolutionary processes giving
rise to that biodiversity at every level of biological organisation” in my
body, did anyone notice that “Natural
Selection” is an oxy moron? “Selection implies… no no… demands
intelligence, and Natural implies an preexisting organized plan. Ok, I’ve had
my fun, let’s move on…
Did any of you notice the erroneous
dates given in the above Wiki quote above?
What is Carbon?
Carbon is all of what the academic
world says it is, although misunderstood to some degree, and then some. Coal is the most common form or carbon, which exists due to large amounts of accumulation of dead bio mass. Carbon
is the final stage of the purification process of the bio mass of the planet,
it exists as a result of decay. Decay is as a result of any living thing which
no longer has the ability to receive or transfer energy. The decay rate of this
planet has not always been the same, this is evidenced by how long things lived
in the past as compared to how long they lived today. To my knowledge there is
no science that came and measure how long something lived, or is there? The
Neanderthal man which science has created out of their lack of knowledge of a
God, carries the characteristics it does not because of its early evolutionary
pre modern man development, but these characteristics observed such as the
enlarge brow bone is as a result of longevity of life. In other words, if man
today lived as long as people did in the days of Adam, a large brow bone would
no doubt develop. The point to this is that the reader understand that Decay in
the first thousand years was near nonexistent. After the events of the division
of the earth in the days of Peleg, and I do not mean the BS Pangea THEORY which is
another can of nonexistent worms, those things living began to decline in the
longevity of life as a result of those principles which enable an increase in decay,
that increased of decay rate came as result of those thing which once protected
this planet that was changed lost and altered as a result of the division of
the earth in the days of Peleg. Are you confused yet?
Decay, or should I say the decay rate
is the underlying problem with Radio Carbon 14 dating. But before we enter into
this profound error of understanding let’s talk about the other problem, pride.
It is one thing to be educated in the field and excel at it with knowledge,
correct or incorrect… it is another to be so proud, that when they discover the
very curriculum in which they were indoctrinated with for 4 to 8 years and
paid thousands of dollars to receive, is false, but still they present the
fallacies knowing it is falsified… the words integrity, honesty, education,
intelligence and knowledge goes out the window and they have wasted their very
being… “they” know who I am talking about…
Radiometric dates are scattered, and anomalies
are often not reported:
Here are just a few of the hundreds of unpublished
quotes…
"Improved
laboratory techniques and improved constants have not reduced the scatter in
recent years. Instead, the uncertainty grows as more and more data is
accumulated ... " (Waterhouse).
"In general, dates
in the `correct ball park' are assumed to be correct and are published, but
those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor are discrepancies
fully explained." (Mauger)
" ... the thing to
do is get a sequence of dates and throw out those that are vastly
anomalous." (Curtis et al)
" ... it is usual
to obtain a spectrum of discordant dates and to select the concentration of
highest values as the correct age." (Armstrong and Besancon).
"In general,
strong discordances can be expected among ages deduced by different
methods." (Brown and Miller)
The God Particle…
Back to decay, decay exists as a
result of what even physicists call, “the
God Particle.” Even though I am certain a majority do not believe in a God,
they know there is something there and they just can’t understand that it is
not “a particle” it cannot be measured, seen under the microscope, or
identified in any fashion, in reality it can only be known by faith… it is the
very thing which gives life, gives energy in all of its observed applied and
measured ways, it is what makes light possible, gravity, it is what regulates
time as we know it and what we don’t know, it is what causes nature to
organize… naturally… it is what makes existence as we know it, possible.
In the beginning God created the
heavens and the earth and when he divided the waters from the waters and then there
were two, the waters above the firmament and the waters below the firmament
from which he caused the dry land to appear. The waters below the firmament he
called the seas of this planet. However Moses does not expand upon the waters
above the firmament. Without explanation these waters formed a canopy around
the earth which at the time was much needed in order to protect the living from
the immense inundation of that very God Particle that the academic world knows
of. This is why “decay” in the first 1000 years was almost unknown and at a
minimum and why men lived to be a ripe old age. The incident of the earth being
flooded was only the beginning but this temporary event and disturbance of the
distribution of this God Particle was only the beginning. After this event, the
canopy must have remained or reformed to some degree as the life span of man did not drastically diminish but slowly
began to decline. It was not until the event some 300 years later when the
earth divided in the days of Peleg, (This does not mean Pangaea which is a fantasy) when this planet lost its canopy and
protection from the bombardment of this God Particle, and rain which was unheard of
prior to the great flood, became the norm.
Carbon 12, 13 and 14…
EVERY element on this planet is
capable of existing in the four known states, solid, or it’s frozen state,
liquid, gas, and energy state or should I say EMC squared? Close but
misunderstood.
Carbon 12 and 13 are for the most
part the same thing, one of which may be more susceptible in reaching a liquid
state which is almost unheard of with Carbon. Carbon is perfectly content in
seeming to bypass the liquid state. Two things regulate the state in which an
element exists or may exist, Temperature and pressure. In the case of Carbon,
one must manipulate the pressure factor in order to see or experience Liquid
Carbon.
Carbon 12 and believed to be 13 exist
in solid form and considered “stable.” Any element capable of reaching the
point of its energy state is considered to be, or the process known as,
“Radioactive.” Radioactive is not the scary word science has made it.
Carbon 14 is considered as Radioactive but not dangerous,
however an element such as Uranium due to its instability, is dangerous where
as carbon 14 is not. In short, the
quicker an element can move from its solid state to its energy state naturally, the more
dangerous it is and the easier it is to manipulate and manipulation by man makes it even more so dangerous. Truth be
known, there is enough potential energy trapped in a common household spoon
that if released all at once, could level a city block if you can find a way to
take it from solid to energy, instantly, this is the manipulation that makes
Uranium even more dangerous than it already is.
From WIKI
Cosmic rays are
high-energy radiation, mainly originating outside the Solar System. Upon impact
with the Earth's atmosphere, cosmic rays can produce showers of secondary
particles that sometimes reach the surface.[LMAO!] Composed primarily of high-energy
protons and atomic nuclei, they are of
mysterious origin. Data from the Fermi Space Telescope (2013) have been
interpreted as evidence that a significant fraction of primary cosmic rays
originate from the supernovae explosions of stars. Active galactic nuclei probably also produce cosmic rays. [WIKI],
no seriously… they did “a study”
“Cosmic Ray action?” Buzz lightyear
to star command… It is believed today that C14 is created by cosmic ray action, what ever that might be... (at this point I would love to see a science animated cartoon of Cosmic Ray Action...) and as many times as I have read it, I just don’t understand how they derived
at this, after all, it was written during those years in which Buck Rogers was popular, it gets
more ridiculous the deeper you dig. What puzzles me is that educated men
believe these strange publications written by men who were not there in the beginning,
but do not believe the writings of those who were there… C 14 is as a result of
the remaining decay process of
Carbon, in the beginning of time in the days of Adam, decay was MUCH less than
it is today, so the C 14 available to measure contained in anything of that time
period would be next to nothing. Without going into exact amounts, science
today measures the percentage amount of C 14 contained within a given former
biological object. Although there are many circumstances even today that can
alter these levels from place to place, the academics have establish what they
believe to be a constant. Although they do not see it and would never admit to
it, “a constant” of any kind is the
biggest enemy Evolutionist have and those who promote Radiocarbon dating.
It is said that the half-life of C 14
is approximately 5730 years, my first question is, who was there 5730 years ago
to count and Measure the norm at that time? Wait until you read how this method
was determined, and these so called degree carrying men actually accept this.
The presence or creation of C 14, a
product of the decay of Carbon prior to the crucifixion was significantly less
than it is today, even much more so prior to the Division of the earth in the
days of Peleg and by reason and comparison to the life span of man BY
DOCUMENTATION IGNORED… prior to the great flood, C 14 existence was near
nothing at a reasonable estimated ten times less than today.
Just for perspective, It is said that
in nature, for every 1 trillion Carbon 12 atoms there is ONE C 14 isotope,
sounds like allot doesn’t it? It is estimated that there are 100 Trillion atoms
in one human cell and estimated the same number of cells in the human body,
that’s 100 C 14 isotopes estimated per cell of the human body, the human body is
presumed to be about 18% carbon.
Radio Carbon dating if it were not
plagued with many other seeming superficial variances, and if it were not for
the problem of “Consistency” Radio Carbon dating COULD be fairly accurate with
many other evidences to back it up of
“known” items in AD times or consideration of all things, and for the most part it is fairly accurate IN AD TIMES. However prior to 2000 years
ago the numbers begin to become unreliable due to a diminished decay rate as
compared to today giving the illusion of longevity, and for those things which existed prior to the Days of
Peleg, the numbers become extremely erroneous not only due to an almost
nonexistent decay rate but the pride of those who adhere to the theory of
evolution which appears the story of is told based on episodes of Buzz
Lightyear and the Emperor Zurg…
A highly recommended read is found
here at
https://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating.html By Professor David A. Plaisted
The more the scientist academics attack the publication of an author refuting their claims, and touching upon truth... the more these academic writers expose
themselves and the clearer we can see their nakedness...