Welcome to Tuscoro.com

Read More......


Tuesday, July 21, 2020

In Search of the Garden of Eden

the Origin of the 7 Cities of Cibola
the 7 Caves of the Aztec

The title topics above will be one of the most difficult for me to put words to, not because the evidence is lacking, but because of all the misinformation published since they were first written about.

What does the 7 Cities have to do with the Garden of Eden? Maybe nothing, maybe everything, this is something the reader will have to decide.
I would really like to know who is reading, if you would please pm me, comment anything other than a “like” which tells me you didn’t read but that you at least seen it… It is almost as if the posts are not getting to my friends… like that ever happens… This article is purposely without photos… lets see who actual reads…

The Garden of Eden

Anyone who has given any serious or even mild effort to study the Old Testament, knows that the Garden was first written about in the first of the five books of Moses, other wise known as the Torah and under the instruction of God, in and effort to write the history from the beginning of time and to the events after Moses led the Children of Israel from Bondage and Captivity. The Torah is also known as, The Book of the Law, and by others it is known as, the Brass Plates.

I recommend a reading of not only Genesis of the Old Testament, but in addition a general synopsis of what the Scholar’s and or WIKI writers are regurgitating. I will only address a small part of this in order to bring certain aspects of common sense to light.

10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
11 The name of the first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where there is gold;
12 And the gold of that land is good: there is bdellium and the onyx stone.
13 And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
14 And the name of the third river is Hiddekel: that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river is Euphrates.

After reading this it seems pretty cut and dry doesn’t it? The problem is, the rivers do not fit with the academic views, and are we to understand that the names being used by Moses are references to the original names from the times of Adam PRIOR to the Earth being flooded, or the names given to the new surroundings where the Ark Landed no doubt placing names of the previous world upon the new world. An example of this can be found among the curious people called Later Day Saints or best known as Mormons, The Book of Mormon tells tales of the old world in which they came from and many names from the old world are placed upon things here in the new world such as Jerusalem, a city located in The Land Northward, which is later destroyed by the Waters coming up in stead thereof, at the time of the great destruction or the Crucifixion. We also have the LDS people after migrating to Utah, placing upon the cities the names of Ancient cites found in the text of their book, such as Lehi, Nephi, Moroni and Manti just to name a few, does this some how make these places one and the same as those found in the Book of Mormon?

This perspective may or may not be worthy, but to assume the Ark departed from the area of the proposed academic location, and floated freely for not only 40 days and nights but another 100 and some days, that it would miraculously land geographically near the same general area? I don’t think so…

However, what puzzles me the most is the seeming blatant ignorance to the text found in verse 10 of the 2nd chapter of Genesis above.

According to the many hypothesis of where Eden was, the existence of rivers is used in most of them, however in each case, NONE begin as a single river that divides and becomes 4 rivers. Each of the Scholar’s of these previous mention hypothesis, openly and clearly describe rivers of which their starting points are hundreds of miles apart NEVER meeting the requirement of the text of 10th verse, 2 Genesis.  

Now I have not covered the entire face of the globe looking for this specific arrangement especially because I presume the earth today looks nothing like it did in the days of Adam, however strangely enough, there is one location where in not only is this possible, but the geological evidences shows that it once existed and in part still does.

And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.

In order for a single river, large enough to divide and to become classed as 4 rivers, not creeks, brooks or washes, it would seem a very large source of water would be needed. There are 2 scenarios in which this may have happened, much of which I have already written in my first previous book, (Nephite North). Based on the text of Genesis 2, some geographic circumstances had to exist, for example, this large river could have breached the surface being of a source of a large underground river, which naturally flows from the North to the equator and upon surfacing due to periodic earth quakes obstructing its natural flow underground, then divides, presumably from the top of a mountain providing the means to divide and peruse 4 directions, or the river source gathered into a lake and as a result of the effluents and volume, departed in 4 different effluents or rivers or a mixture of the two.

Isaiah 41:18 “I will open rivers in high places, and fountains in the midst of the valleys: I will make the wilderness a pool of water, and the dry land springs of water.”

As you can see in the above quote from Isaiah, speaking of a future event, this has happened before and it will happen again, and is absolutely fitting in the proposed location that I have not yet revealed.

One of the many hypotheses regarding the Garden, one stand out for me. According to WIKI we have the following…

 Latter Day Saints
Followers of the Latter Day Saints movement (also known as Mormons) believe that after Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden they resided in a place known as Adam-ondi-Ahman, located in present-day Daviess County, Missouri. It is recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants that Adam blessed his posterity there and that he will return to that place at the time of the final judgement in fulfillment of a prophecy set forth in the Book of Mormon.

A location for the Garden as compared to Adam-ondi-Ahman is not given, but is suspect that it would be westerly simply because when Adam was expelled from the Garden, he went “East out of Eden” This of course suggests that the Garden of Eden was on this continent, and if the LDS doctrine is correct, there would have to be some form of evidence of which there is. NOTE: to my LDS friends, Adam-Ondi-Ahman IS NOT synonymous with the Garden of Eden. But where is a place where in this geologic wonder occurred and likely will again?

The Waters of Ripliancum

Again in the contents of the Book of Mormon and more specifically the book of Ether, is a reference to one of the most misunderstood place names in the combined books, The Waters of Ripliancum. I could fill a book with the conjecture and regurgitation of Scholar’s regarding this elusive source of water, most of which are of the LDS faith. Why is it they all seem to presume it is a large body of water, and always it seems, a lake? NOWHERE in the text does it say anything about it being a river, fountain or a lake.

Ether 15:8 And it came to pass that he came to the waters of Ripliancum, which, by interpretation, is large, or to exceed all; wherefore, when they came to these waters they pitched their tents; and Shiz also pitched his tents near unto them; and therefore on the morrow they did come to battle.

Them? as in more than one?

The only real things we know about these waters is, that it is water, they are large, they are in the land Northward, they existed in the days of the Jaredites and may not exist today simply because according to the same text source, at the crucifixion, the ENTIRE face of the land was changed. It would be presumptuous to think they still exists, or do not. I certainly wouldn’t want the reader to believe something just because I said it, but I will ask to at least consider, the evidences of this are found in my first book titled Nephite North. With this said, let me say that what I know is the elusive waters mention are the source waters in which flows under the mountains of Utah as a result of fractures from the North to the South due to Sudden Pole Shifts of the past, this is a part of what is called the Ring of Fire. The water travels through these natural conduits from the North towards the equator, with the earth acting in its rotation due to centrifugal force as a water pump.

At times in the past, this source of water has been forced to the surface due to earthquakes causing the natural channels to be blocked and forcing the waters to the surface through the earth’s fractures. This is the same type of event which caused the creation of Lake Bonneville, Lake Lahonton of Nevada and what is now called Lake Uinta but is better known by some circles as Lake Copola. The evidences of this type of event can be tricky to see, not because it requires a stretch of the imagination, it is because the majority have been “Taught” to believe… the results of this event I have just described can be seen in the tops many of the mountains along this natural water corridor. One of the best places to see this is the entire tops of Uinta Mountains, of course geologist will tell you that these horse shoe formations are results of “glacial melt” as a result of “The Last Ice age.” I would love to have them explain an existing feature called Cedar Breaks in Utah and the like as compared to the tops of Uintas mountains and a relatively small location at the base of Nebo Mountain also in Utah, and explain how the presumed slow melting of a glacier forms these formations of hoodoo’s in such an isolated spot while ignoring everything around it! Then there are the massive river deltas here in Utah, while one canyon displays a very large Delta and the one next to it is a canyon with an equivalent watershed collection area and it displays no evidence of a delta at all!

My reasoning for bringing this up is two fold, one is to show that some time in our ancient past, the evidence shows that text in the Mormon book  may be true, also to show that the most important feature in which the 7 cities of Cibola have always been associated with, lake Copola but largely ignore, not only by today’s researchers but also the Spanish, and why? Because they did not find the lake which accompanied the original information handed down from their ancestors, from the Roman Colonies Welsh, and or Indo-Greeks and Portuguese expeditions from centuries before. As a result of a massive earthquake in about 900 AD, the lake exited southward, this event is likely the very same event responsible for the Colorado Plateau uplift, an event in which geologist say occurred 20 million years ago and the disappearance of this lake at 30 million years ago, this cannot be the truth.

The 7 Cities of Cibola

What is it that has kept various cultures coming to the Americas all seeming to be looking for the same location? Why is it many of the 15th,  16th and 17th Century Cartographers always included this elusive lake on their maps and often times, the 7 cities? Who built these cities and where are they now? What happened to the lake and the cities? The 7 Cities is NOT to be confused with the 7 Caves of the Aztec.

The following in this paragraph is short of evidences but with admitted speculative common sense I will give this hypothesis. It would seem the 7 cities were built by and as a result of what I would say is the first wave of Europeans beginning as early as 100 BC some time not long after either Alexander the Great in about 326 BC or King Demetrius in about 180 BC, or some time between, the ancient libraries of the people of India were sacked where in it was found ancient manuscripts showing the maps of ancient voyages of their people from the days prior to the voyages of the King of Tyre, King Solomon’s friend. The Greeks knew well and good the stories of King Solomon and the voyages of the Phoenician King of Tyre, King Hiram, in fact they likely had much more information than we have today. These were the primary contributors to the Imperial Library of Constantinople which would not be established for a few hundred years, with much of the contents which likely came from the ancient library of Alexandria of Egypt. What would the Voyages of the Phoenician King Hiram have to do with the people of India?

If the above paragraph is true, why would these people have settled in this place in and around lake Copola at the foot of the Uinta mountains and south along the green river drainage of today? Lets step back in time a bit… Many of you are familiar with the many discoveries in the past that suggest Phoenicians visited this land in the past, but few know of the occupation of the people from India and the very reason why the Americas were at one time referred to as the “West” Indies, a term in which we were led to believe was created because Columbus thought it was where he had arrived as in India? But if this were true, wouldn’t he have first approached the shores of East India had he voyaged across the Atlantic? Or is someone going to try and convince me it is because he went west? The title “Indian” given to the ancient Native people of this land, was quite literally because “Some” of them are actually decent of the people of India particularly the Maya, and Columbus damned well knew this.

Turn to your pages of the Bible to the story of King Solomon, 1st Kings, end of Chapter 9 and onto Chapter 10, why is the story of King Hiram intertwined with the story of the Queen of Sheba? Why do the Scholar’s not consider? Why is it when the story doesn’t meet their curriculum, the default is always dump it on Africa? Hiram was not sailing to Africa, Ophir is not in Africa, and the Queen of Sheba is not from Africa. Here is another hypothesis, but there is much evidence that will not be given here as it is already written in my many articles and in my Book title The Forbidden Histories of the Americas

The Phoenician King, Hiram of Tyre would set sail from time to time under the directions of King Solomon, to a place named as Ohpir, why and how Scholar’s have determined this is in Africa baffles me. Hiram was raised in the outskirts of a principle city called Sidon located at the edge of the sea, thought to mean Fishery or Fishing town. The city of Tyre where he ruled, was a satellite of Sidon and grew into one of the most important Phoenician cities. Sidon is interesting to me as this rare word also shows up in the book used by Mormons being a principle river. According to some of the Native people, the name given by my ancestors the Lenape was Ma-Supi, (fish river) other tribes it was known as Misi-Ziibi (great river). Interestingly enough, the Sidon River according to my findings yet contrary to those who foment the “Homeland Model” of Book of Mormon lands, is NOT the entire Mississippi River. Ancient Sidon prior to the Crucifixion flowed from its source waters, “Ripliancum” into the elusive lake Copola, which at that time is suspect of having its primary effluent which drained to the east forming the head waters of the Missouri, then arriving at the confluence of the Mississippi with the volume of the Missouri causing the river to flow to the east of what is now known as Cahokia. After the events of the crucifixion, OR the Earthquake of 900 AD, the primary flow which was the Missouri was cut off when the Colorado Mountain rose up, and the main flow of lower Sidon became the upper Mississippi river which at the confluence caused the river to flow on the west side of Cahokia. With this said, was there a city named Sidon at the edge of the sea Copola? Where is/was REALLY the city known in the Mormon book, Zarahemla? There will be a few that will scratch there heads over this paragraph…

Anyway, the thing that stands out for me is, the ancient River Sidon which ORIGINATED at the very place in which Hiram at Ophir while likely Mining, (Mina del Ray located near Granddaddy Lake Uinta Mountains), met the people of the Queen of Sheba, (short for Shem-Bhala, meaning Children of Shem). These people who met Hiram and his men, Hiram likely taught them of his friend and legendary King, Solomon, the man who was offered of God anything he wanted but who chose Wisdom. Those men of the Queen of Sheba who met Hiram and his men likely returned to the Yucatan Peninsula to their “mythical kingdomShem-Bhala, at the land they colonized some time before Hiram’s voyages, and to tell their Queen of this great King from near their place of origin, India. No wonder they can’t find this mythical lost kingdom, they are looking on the wrong continent… Did I mention that the mother of Buddha’s name is Maya? Who was Buddha? (See The Forbidden Histories of the Americas)

Isn’t it amazing how the historic mysteries and even Mythical begin to unfold when you do not adhere to educated orthodox thinking?

I must sincerely apologize to the reader and the skilled academics at this time, I don’t mean to write with a chip on my shoulder,  it is just the way I am, and although it is no excuse, I offer this, I have read so many academic papers and cites or quotes from so called sources, it at times makes me sick, Wiki quoting a book author who wrote a book five years ago, who is quoting an author from a book written two years prior who in turn is quoting some other recent opinion… why can’t we just get to the original source instead of telling us what the original words were actually saying, did it ever occur to some that the original author might have actually meant what they wrote? This kind of research practice these days is the inspiration of my new coined phrase… “Regurgitation of Indoctrination will never amount to Truth nor Intelligence” If you find any of my works as offensive, remember, you are more than welcome to not read it… Besides, I have discovered I am allergic to bullshit… ;-)

The 7 Caves of the Aztec

Now that we have touched upon the “considered to be mythological by most Scholar’s” Garden of Eden, and the mythical 7 Cities of Cibola, and discovering after an extensive and rigorous search, that I could not find any give a damn… let’s turn our attention to the 7 Caves of Chicomoztoc of the Aztec which has gone down in the regurgitated history as the birth place of the Aztec, which being no surprise to me, isn’t the truth.

We know from the un-regurgitated Aztec record that according to the Aztec, they originated from two places, a first mentioned place from the record where in their people left a great tower where in the Gods destroyed it and confused their language. They left this place after building boats which they knew how to do ever since that guy Noah did it… and eventually left the old continent arriving on the western shores of this land... Sort of… and a much later and second migration of people who arrived at a very specific date which escapes me at this time, in about 600 BC, it is said they came from the North East across the sea, it is mentioned that those who arrived were of light completion of which they, the Aztec being in poor condition, took them to be their leaders. They eventually ended up in a place called Aztlan, a place that at times has been referred to by different cultures pronunciations as in, Atlan-tis, Avalon or Affalon, and suspect Antilla and Ophir, but most curious, Havilah. According to the actual Aztec records, for some reason they left this land of Aztlan in “Humility” some time around 900 AD, it would seem there was some sort of natural disaster and or upheaval that drastically changed the climatic conditions in Aztlan, from near tropical and a near Garden of Eden sort of place, to high country desert. This event no doubt caused a sudden draining of Lake Copola which also added to the new dryer environment. I would venture to say these people saw this event as a punishment of the Gods which would explain the use of the word humility. From their home in Aztlan said to be an Island surrounded by a large sea, they then traveled south to a place where in there were caves or grottoes in which they inhabited for 200 to 300 years before leaving the caves and traveling further south into today’s Mexico.

Again I would venture to say that the 7 caves were well known by the Aztec knowing they were there beforehand and having been abandoned long before. These caves having likely been built by and abandoned by the previous culture from India, but possibly by their own ancestors at a time when the Chinese came to America the first time, around 100 BC and met a people whom they say had no religion and they had horses. It is said by the Chinese record that the inhabitants were living in the caves of a Great Canyon described and likely by the description, can only be the Grand Canyon by their description. They are said to have taught them Buddhism and if you read the article regarding the Cave supposedly and likely discovered by G. E. Kincaid, the article describes what can only be artifact items that can only be of Hindu or oriental origin, NOT Egyptian. Although Kincaid said the caves “was of Oriental origin, “possibly” from Egypt.” He then described the Idols found within and describes what can only be renditions of Buddha or Vishnu, “sitting with legs crossed holding a lily in each hand? “The cast of the face is Oriental…. The idol almost resembles Buddha”  Egypt has no such God as described.

The cave discovered just in the entrance is described exactly as the Aztec Cave rendition found in Historia Tolteca Chichimeca.

The Image and the description given by Kincaid, if the 1909 incident is real, leads me to believe that the 7 Caves are within the one cave found by Kincaid. If this is true, then there is explanation in order for several other suspect locations of Caves, One which describe a “cave of enormous dimension containing amounts unknown to any man” and one in particular described by certain Ute Indians as an “underground city large enough to house 50,000 people,” and it is not in the Grand Canyon, but suspect as one of the 7 City locations indicated on the old maps. It would appear that some of the cities indicated were in fact an underground city, accompanied with a surface city. 

Wednesday, July 15, 2020

Erasing History, again and again...

-- Changing times has made it difficult for me to find the motive and time 
to write it has been a real struggle here as a result, my appologies to the 
readers for my absense--

Romans and Welsh in America

Prince Madoc was following the very old trail of his grandfathers…

In this day and age, an all out effort is obviously underway to ONCE AGAIN erase the history of this Nation. I suspect this round of destruction of history is for other reasons not necessarily connected to the reasons of past extermination of people and history… True history cannot be erased, it will always resurface in some way…

Another all out effort took place in the early 1500’s headed up by Hernan Cortez, and under the very same thumb as our suppressors of history today, the Roman Empire, under King Charles. The Holy Roman Empire is the same entity who has done this several times in the past, to hide up the history of the near forgotten Olmec, Welsh, Indo Greeks and other cultures who have inhabited the Americas. WHY?

Consider the words spoken in this account above given by Conquistador Bernal Diaz del Castillo a soldier of fortune, recorded in his memoirs. Bernal served under Hernan Cortez and was present at the meetings between Moctezuma and Cortez.

As ridiculous as it seems to me… I can only surmise, but it seems as though greed and control is the culprit. What difference does it make who supposedly discovered America? Why does it matter who came here first and why do they always ignore the people who were here when they arrived? Changing history or efforts to hide or erase history is not going to change a thing… But they do know something about this land that few know… What is it really all about? I wish I could tell the story...

In this article, I would like to bring to your attention to a discovery made in 1924 known as The Tucson Lead crosses or The Silver Bell artifacts. I am not going to include all the nitty gritty details of the discovery nor all that has been written about them, especially all those who have written without intelligence against them, I will say that regardless of what the naysayers have written, the artifacts have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, and still they speak out against them… Why? It is no longer a theory in that Europeans came to the Americas long before Columbus and it was well known by not only Hernan Cortez, but also Columbus.

The following is one of the many writings acknowledging the authenticity, I cannot find the original author as I have tried many times, and apparently a student of the Jewish Catholic State in Roman times past and referred to himself as a Catholic Jew. I have investigated many of the seeming statements made within, only to find the HIGH probability of what he has written. I would also suspect a majority of his research material was from the following…

You may also find the writings of Cyclone Covey whom I spoke to at length two months before his passing, A former professor of Wake Forest University in Illinois, see his book (Calalus: A Roman Jewish colony in America from the time of Charlemagne through Alfred the Great).

Also see recent publication by Donald Yates, The Tucson Artifacts.

With all this said, here is the article by unknown author.

Calalus: A Jewish Catholic State in Early Medieval America

Nehushtan of Calalus

In the 1920’s in Tucson Arizona were found objects and writings in Latin, Greek and Hebrew with both Catholic and Jewish ritual objects and symbols. Cyclone Covey describes this discovery in his book “Calalus: A Roman Jewish colony in America from the time of Charlemagne through Alfred the Great”. Covey and other researchers are amazed at the mixture of Jewish, Christian and Kabbalistic objects and symbols. However this very much fits this period in the 8th century when in the Carolingian Empire there is a Jewish Principality in southern France called Septimania ruled by Theodoric of Narbonne (Makhir Todros ben Judah/Magnario/Aimeri/Amer) [born 710 died 765]. Many members of this family descended from the Exilarchs of Babylon embraced a Jewish form of Catholicism while other members remained outwardly orthodox Jews.

Calalus artifacts from Tucson

The Calalus records speak of a Theodorus as the leader of many peoples who leave the Roman lands for Calalus in 775 AD. Covey and others believe that Theodorus is a Jewish leader in the city of Rome. However this is a too literal reading of the term Rome. Theodorus is none other than the Jewish King of Septimania – a Roman Jewish state in southern France. He is the son of the first Jewish King of Septimania also called Theodoric (Theuderic/Thierry/Aimeri de Narbonne/ Makhir Todros). Theodorus (Dietrich/Theodoric/Amery l’Chetif/Nehemiah/Namon/ Aumer ben Aumer) is also known as Theodoric King of Saxony and as Namus Duke of Bavaria. He and his brothers were great Warrior Davidic princes of the time of Charlemagne. Professor Arthur Zuckerman in his book “A Jewish Princedom in Feudal France” confuses him with his father who bears the same Frankish names of Theuderic and Aimeri. On the death of his father Makhir Theodoric in about 765 AD Nehemiah Theodoric becomes the Western Exilarch and leader of all the Jews of the revived Western Roman Empire of Charlemagne.

In 775 AD Nehemiah Theodoric reconquered the American Empire of Calalus. Calalus was ruled by the ‘Silvanus Tolteczus’ [Solomon the Builder] the hereditary ruler of this former Jewish ruled Roman colony. Calalus was founded in the 1st century BC by the Babylonian Exilarch known as Silvanus Ogam or Silvanus Brabo (Solomon II Babylonian Exilarch, Nasi of Mara, Ruler of Sumer (Somerset)in Britain) a great Roman Jewish ruler, soldier and ancestor of the Swan Knights (Barbur haKatzin). He also had a fleet of trading vessels known as the ships of Solomon or the Swan boats. The ships are shaped like a Swan with its sails like the wings of a beautiful gliding white Swan. After the defeat of the Silvanus Toltezus the members of the Royal Family were sent back to Europe where they were under the protection of Nehemiah Theodorus and his family. The legends of Doon and Ogier are based on the activities of this family descended from Duon (Duon) Antigoon (Ogier) and Silvanus Brabo (Solomon Barbur). The legends of Ogier the Dane [son of Godfred (Cadrod)] and Doon de Mayence actually refer to the Tuatha de Danaan or Dunann who are also known as the Mananaan or Maine of America where the giant Ogre heads of the Olmec are found. The Irish legend of Regamon also allude to this family. 

The Jews of this ancient Roman Jewish Kingdom of Rhoda were also known as the Rhodans or Radhanites and were great Jewish merchants who controlled the ancient trade routes. The Rhone Valley and river were named after these Jewish Radhanite merchants who used the Rhone Valley as a base for their trading empire. Many of them settled in Ireland in the first centuries AD uniting with their cousins descended from St Joseph of Arimathea. Isaac Kalonymus the son of Nehemiah Theodoric [of Ripaurien] was also known as Isaac the Radhanite. Ibn Khordadbeh's account of the Radhanites stresses their source somewhere beyond the Western Sea and the land of the Franks.

In the fifth century Calalus was part of the Revived Western Empire of King Arthur a descendant of the Swan Knights. By the eighth century due to admixture with the American Indians the state had reverted to paganism. Nehemiah Theodorus led an expedition in 775 to return Calalus to Jewish and Roman rule. He conquered the ancient city of Rhoda and the Jewish law was restored. After 4 years in 779 AD Nehemiah Theodorus left Calalus for his kingdom in France which he had left in the hands of his brother Guillame de Gellone (Mar Nathan Kalonymus)[b.739 d.793 killed in the battle of Carcasonne). He then appointed a British Davidic Prince Jacob as the Jewish King of Calalus as regent for his young son Israel who was married to Jacob’s daughter. Jacob was a descendant of King Arthur as well as the Jewish Royal family of Bernicia. Jacob was the leader of the British Jewish settlers in Calalus. The Roman Jewish Settlers of Calalus in the 8th century were made up of two main groups – the Latin Jewish group from the Frankish Empire and the British Jewish group from the British Isles

The Olmec/Ogre image which the Ogre is based on

Nehemiah Theodoric ha Makhiri reigned in Germany until his death in 790 AD. He was one of Charlemagne’s leading advisers. He learnt about the land of Calalus from Gerard a member of the Swan Knight family that came to Charlemagne’s court in a Swan boat. He married Adalis a daughter of Nehemiah (aka Duke Namon). The Swan Knight’s ancestors had come to Ireland from Calalus in the 2nd and 3rd centuries AD and intermarried with the descendants of Nathan the Red (Nathan the Rhodan) a grandson of Mar Joseph of Arimathea. Mar Joseph was a grandson of Silvanus Ogam or Brabo (Barbur) the great Roman Jewish warrior who defeated the giant American Emperor of Ogam or Ogier called Druon Antigoon in later European legends. Druon means oak and describes the stature of Antigoon. The Ogam script was named for Silvanus Ogam (Solomon II/ Shalom/ Sulam/ Selim/ Silvius/Salvius /Salvo)who brought it from America to Europe. Ogam or Ogham is the legendary home of the Ogres and I believe that they refer to the Olmec culture of Mexico.

The Swan Knight

Mar Joseph’s grandson Nathan had travelled to America with his kinsman Nathaniel Bar Tolmai (St. Bartholomew). Nathaniel was a grandson of Silvanus Ogam the Jewish ruler of Calalus. Solomon II ben Nathan I Zisutra was succeeded as Babylonian Exilarch by his son Nathan II Ukba , as Ruler of Somerset and the tin mines by his son Mar Chunya the father of Mar Joseph of Arimathea and as Ruler of Calalus by his son Mar Tolmai ha Barbur the father of St. Bartholomew. St. Bartholomew is remembered in America as Quetzalcoatl the white bearded priest. His son Eliud ha Barbur was the father of Silvanus Tolmai the ruler of Atala (America) and the Lord Master (Baal)of Anahuac/Anu (Mexico) and Calalus (North America). 

On Nehemiah Theodorus’ return to the Frankish Roman Empire in 779 he left his brother as the Jewish ruler of Septimania and he became the Jewish ruler of the German lands of Bavaria and Saxony in Germany under Charlemagne’s authority. His son Isaac Kalonymus (also called William of Gellone like his uncle) later in life with his wife became Catholics and he is remembered as St William of Gellone. He has been confused with his uncle Nathan Kalonymus (b.739 d.793) who was also known as William of Gellone and Toulouse who died fighting the Muslims. St William Isaac of Gellone and Toulouse(b.755 d.814 as a monk) as a new Christian went to visit his brother Israel I of Calalus and converted him to his mystical Jewish brand of Catholicism as practiced by the royal and noble families of Western Europe. Israel I had become the King of Calalus in 785 AD on the death of his father-in-law Jacob. In 800 AD Isaac Kalonymus and his two converted brothers Benjamin and Judah went to reinforce the colony with 700 soldiers. Israel I and many of the people embraced Catholicism under the teaching of the three converso brothers of the Makhiri dynasty (Magnarvm). Israel I established his brothers as High Priests of Calalus. From this time Calalus becomes a Jewish Catholic state with a ritual and spirituality derived from both Jewish and Catholic sources. Israel I Guriat reigned for 67 years until 852 AD when he was succeeded by his son Israel II (852-858). St William Isaac of Gellone was two years in America (800-802) which was also known as the Isles of Barzel (Iron/Brazil)and from this time he also was known as Barzillai or Barzelay.

Tucson artifact with ten in Latin

Israel II ha Magnarvm (Merfyn/Merwan/Mermin/Makhiri) spend some of his earlier years in Septimania and Wales where his son Israel Septimus (or Israel the Septimani) was born in 832 AD. Israel II as Merfyn became King of Gwynedd in 825 in right of his mother the granddaughter and heiress of King Cynan. In 844 Merfyn left Wales for Septimania with his other children, leaving his son Mar Jacob ha Rhodri as King of Gwynedd. He was known as Rhodri Mawr. Israel Merfyn returned to Calalus (which was called Manaan in Wales) and succeeded his father as Israel II. Israel III Septimus became King of Calalus in 858 at the age of 26. He fought many battles and later he granted the conquered pagan Tolteczas independence in 880. He was deposed by the Sanhedrin of Calalus and his son Israel IV replaced him and Israel III was banished. Israel IV began a campaign of war against the Tolteczas that would lead to the eventual end of the colony in the 10th century. The descendants of Israel III Septimus’ son Isaac became the Priest-Kings of the Toltecs who moved south to Mexico. They abolished the human sacrifices of the natives but they were restored (c.1018) after the Rhodans left America.

Another Nehushtan of Calalus

Israel III went south to the Toltec lands of Mexico and his grandson Makhir/Americ (Meurig in the Welsh genealogies /Mixcoatl of the Toltecs)was the grandfather of Topiltzin (Israel VII/Idwal) priest of Quetzalcoatl who left Cholula for Rhoda in about 1000 AD. He rejoined the remnant of the Rhodans who he led east and then back to Europe and some of the Latin Jewish Rhodans settled in North Western Spain where as trained Warriors they were welcomed in the fight to preserve the freedom of North Western Spain from the Muslims. Rhodrigo El Cid was Topiltzin’s great-grandson. Topiltzin’s son was called Lain Calvo (Lancelin of Calalus/Lachlan/Llewellyn). Rhodrigo El Cid and his father Diego Lainez (Jacob) married into the Davidic Exilarch family of Barcelona and Este. His daughter Maria Rodriguez was the wife of Raymond Berenger IV Arnold Count of Barcelona [descended in the direct male line from Guibelin (Gui Alberic/Bellon/Yakar ben Judah) of Narbonne, the youngest son of Makhir Todros of Septimania]. Lain Calvo's sister Ximena of Calalus married Fernan Nunez of the Counts of Amaya family. Some genealogists have confused the ancestors of this family of the El Cid

Rhodrigo El Cid

The British Jewish Rhodans settled in Wales. In the 12th century their descendants in Wales went with Prince Madoc ap Owain to America where they established themselves in a series of forts in Alabama and Georgia. The 'Alabama Welsh' website states in regards to Prince Madoc: "...In 1170AD, ten small ships assembled off Lundy Island in the Bristol Channel, which flows between South Wales and Southern England. He and his ten ships were never heard from again. It was many years later when the archealogical discovery of European style structures in the Southeast, built centuries before Columbus' journey, prompted a review of the Welsh histories of Madoc's voyage. A series of pre-Columbian, dressed stone fortifications built up the Alabama River were discovered by later settlers. Three major forts, completely unlike any known Indian structure, were constructed along the route that settlers arriving in Mobile Bay would have taken. The first fort, erected on top of Lookout Mountain, near Desoto Falls, Alabama was found to be nearly identical in setting, layout and method of construction to Dolwyddelan Castle in Gwynedd, the presumed birth place of Madoc of Wales...". It is said that the white Indian tribe of the Mandan were the descendants of these Welsh settlers. The Basque and Portuguese descendants of the Latin Jewish Rhodans went to America after 1492. Another group of the Jewish Rhodans never left America and they eventually moved to the Appalachian Mountains and were later called the Melungeons. Prince Madoc was a descendant of King Jacob ben Israel ha Rhodri (or "the Rhodan") (aka Iago ap Idwal) of Wales. King Jacob (Iago) of Gwynedd (1033-1039) was the brother of Lain Calvo (or Lancelin of Calalus)of Spain. His father was King Israel VII of Calalus (999-1018) not King Idwal of Gwynedd (950-979) as supposed in some genealogies.

Mar Joseph of Arimathea

Some researchers have sought to discredit the Tucson discoveries. They claim that it was the cult objects of a Freemason group because of the mixture of Jewish, Christian and Kabbalistic symbols and because of the poor use of Latin. However the Kabbalah came forth from the region of Septimania through the Makhiri family. Many other factors that were not commonly known in the 1920's and the 19th century confirm for me that these discoveries are indeed genuine and they fit with the evidence from numerous other sources found in the mythology, legends, genealogies and histories of Spain, France, Ireland, and Britain among others. There are still many anti-semitic forces who do not want to see this Jewish connection with the history of America. The cult objects of the Nehushtan and the monstrance and chalices, menorah and the prominence of the Cross demonstrate the religion of Rhodan Calalus is a Jewish brand of Catholicism centred on Eucharistic Adoration themes. The Serpent (Nehushtan) raised in the wilderness is a Eucharistic symbol of the Messiah raised up on the Cross and also raised up in the Monstrance. Covey writes: “Besides the names of the kings, much else on gunbarrel blue to light-lead gray artifacts confirms the colony to be Jewish: a menorah with seven burning candles, a pair of Hebrew goblet-chalices (habdalah), incense spoons, burning incense...and words in carefully-drawn Hebrew script...Their central symbol of the cross, though not unknown to Jewish tradition, was a typical...two of the crosses were nehushtans...” The feathered Serpent associated with Topiltzin as priest of Quetzalcoatl recalls these Nehushtans that were the symbol of the religion of Rhodan Calalus. Topiltzin's grandfather Makhir (Americ) Mixcoatl is also associated with the Serpent (nahash) and is known as the Cloud Serpent. These heavenly Serpents are the Seraphim of Jewish tradition. Topiltzin's grandfather Mixcoatl is also associated with the colour 'Red'- and rhoda means Red. In some accounts Mixcoatl is referred to as the father of Topiltzin but there is disagreement with this in other American Indian traditions.

Nehushtan and Moses

Stegosaurus on Angkor Wat building

Another reason that academics are so keen to dismiss these discoveries is they provide evidence that some dinosaurs lived in historic times as one of the swords discovered has a diplodocus dinosaur on it. The ruins of Angkor Wat in Asia also demonstrate that 800 years ago the builders of Angkor Wat knew what a Stegosaurus looked like long before the modern day discovery of dinosaur artifacts. These artifacts are embarrassing to those who follow an evolutionary dating of the age of the dinosaurs. It is a lot harder to dismiss the Stegosaurus on Angkor Wat than it is the Diplodocus on the Calalus Sword. The Diplodocus skeletons are interestingly found in the North Western part of North America.

Sword of Calalus with a diplodocus on it

The dinosaur diplodocus

The diplodocus remains were first discovered in 1877. Even those who think that Calalus is connected to a 19th century group of Freemasons do not believe the finds are a hoax. However the first discoveries at the site were made in 1884 and already the ground had been hard for a long time which leaves little time for the so-called' Freemasons' to design a sword and place a diplodocus on it. The Calalus discovery is anathema to those who uphold the present orthodoxies in history and science. The Bible itself speaks of the diplodocus as the Behemoth who has a tail like a cedar tree. The 'New York Times' article of 1925 states: "Dr. Neil Judd of the Smithsonian Institution visited the excavation and completely excavated two of the articles himself. He stated that the articles were very old and that there was absolutely no evidence of disturbance of the earth surrounding them. He reached this conclusion after chopping these two pieces loose with a miner's pick." Another 1925 article on the discovery states: "The articles have been found at about the same level, that is, between five and six feet below the surface, and in a well- cemented stratum of caliche, the caliche, or lime formation, being so hard that it is necessary to chop each piece out with a pick. There is no evidence of burial, either in recent or in historic times; in fact, the articles have been covered by a natural process of the washing down of the debris from above, until time has resulted in building up of from five to six feet of overhead. The many scientists who have assisted in the research are unanimous in the opinion that the covering-over process has taken many hundreds of years; in fact, their conclusions tend to place the age of the relics at about the eighth century."

Donald Panther-Yates in his book "Los Lunas Mystery Stone" also believes that the symbols on the objects have their source in the Kabbalah of the Frankish Roman Jewish Kingdom of Septimania rather than a later masonic source. He also sees Kabblaistic symbols on the Los Lunas Stone.

Dr. Covey has said in a communication to Jack Andrews in 1999: "Concerted efforts to discredit (the age of the find) have found no way to insert heavy lead objects up to 6 1/2 feet deep through caliche to lie flat, without fracturing the formation conspicuously".

Translation of the lead crosses

On the cross arm at the left is a profile of a head with the words "BritainAlbion, Jacob." In the center is another head profile with the words "Romans, Actim, Theodore." On the right is another head profile with the words "Gaul, Seine, Israel." On the vertical beam of the lead cross is this inscription. "Counsels of great cities together with seven hundred soldiers A.D. 800, Jan. 1." "We are borne over the sea to Calalus, an unknown land where Toltezus Silvanus ruled far and wide over a people. Theodore transferred his troops to the foot of the city Rhoda and more than seven hundred were captured. No gold is taken away. Theodore, a man of great courage, rules for fourteen years. Jacob rules for six. With the help of God, nothing has to be feared. In the name of Israel, OL."

The second cross has the following inscription: "Jacob renews the city. With God's help Jacob rules with mighty hand in the manner of his ancestors.
 Sing to the Lord. May his fame live forever. OL.

The third cross yielded this inscription. "From the egg (the beginning) A.D. 700 to A.D. 900. Nothing but the cross. While the war was raging, Israel died. Pray for the soul of Israel. May the earth lie light on thee. He adds glory to ancestral glory. Israel, defender of the faith. Israel reigns sixty-seven years."

The next inscription. "Israel II rules for six. Israel III was twenty-six years old when he began to rule. Internecine war. To conquer or die. He flourishes in ancestral honor day by day."

The next inscription. "A.D. 880. Israel III, for liberating the Toltezus, was banished. He was first to break the custom. The earth shook. Fear overwhelmed the hearts of men in the third year after he had fled. They betook themselves into the city and kept themselves within their walls. A dead man thou shall neither bury nor burn in the city. Before the city a plain was extending. Hills rung the city. It is a hundred years since Jacob was king. Jacob stationed himself in the front line. He anticipated everything. He fought much himself. Often smote the enemy. Israel turned his attention to the appointment of priests. We have life, a people widely ruling. OL."

The next inscription. "A.D. 895. An unknown land. Would that I might accomplish my task to serve the king. It is uncertain how long life will 
continue. There are many things which can be said while the war rages. Three thousand were killed. The leader with his principal men are captured. Nothing but peace was sought. God ordains all things. OL."

End of Article

The article you have just read certainly seems plausible, for those of you wondering still, where are the people spoken of in this article among the history we have been taught? Where are the evidences of their existence? The answer to this if you have eyes to see and understand that academia could not possible have destroyed, eliminated or hidden all that was left behind, or could they? Physically destroying, covering up or wisping away the evidences was not always possible. But it has become profoundly obvious especially in these times, how successful the powers that be are at making sense of nonsense, providing explanation that is readily accepted seeming to make sense. Some day… I just might make a long list of all the historic fallacies that have become orthodox belief, and there are many, most of you would have a hard time accepting it as truth… and I get it.

You might consider the true identity of who the Pueblo people were, Fremont people, Gadianton, and other names we have come to accept without question. What culture really built the amazing structure of Chaco Canyon? What was its given name? I don’t mean the physical labor, but under the rule of? What is the real story of Casa Grande? By what name was it known prior to Spanish occupation? What of Casa Grande of Nevada? Who built the many mountain top forts near Payson Arizona and many other places around Arizona and why do the archaeologist tell is the Indians and Spanish did not build them, but when asked who did, they won’t answer… Sometimes I just write to write, to place my thoughts on paper… There is so much more to this, I wish I could articulate and structure it better…

This article was created for the dedicated readers of tuscoro.com in an effort to share with real truth seekers. Whether you agree with the contents here or not is not my concern, I just want to know if I am wasting my time, so I am asking that you comment on the Facebook post, or send me a PM, an email or what have you, just to let me know. Some times, I just want to throw in the towel.

Learn more of the hidden mysteries of the Americas by supporting this site... Every little bit helps.