It has been some 20 years or so since I first imagined
and mentioned of the Mayan People as being descendants of the people of
It would be a few more years before I actually put a
pen to the whole idea. Who knew that the discovery of a small seemingly
insignificant artifact would intimidate the academics so much and spawn a whole
new theory of an ancient civilization of
Buckle found in
And now we have finally from a branch of the academics, a few who are starting to see what I had supposed some years ago…
From the Himalayan Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies by Arushi Gupta with Corresponding Author Humphrey Moseti Omara…
After giving a stereotyped view of the world colonization process they make this statement in the article…
“We ourselves, until recently, were a colony” shedding light on the reality that the two countries had been colonies of European Union, one from Spain and the other from the United Kingdom. Apart from this, there is an ancient connection between the Mayan and the Indian culture.”
This ancient connection is in my estimation about 3000 years ago.
Continuing giving comparisons of culture…
One of the gods known in both countries is the Hindu
god Triloknath, which is one of the names of Shiva, was known to Mexicans with
the same name until the Spaniards arrived and changed the name
to the Tloque Nahuaque… If true, WHY would they do this?
Named the same and look the same? Coincident? If it looks like a duck… and quakes like a duck…
It is surprising how two countries so far from each other have such a similar culture. India and Mexico seem to be like brothers separated over the years and time but still have the same blood running through their veins, made of the same DNA.
The article then goes on comparing various cultural attributes of the two cultures, Religious, Cosmological, Family, Marriage, Society, ETC… making several curious likenesses.
I recall after pondering the possible ways Hinduism,
thought to have been created 3000 years ago, spread from this continent where it actually originated to
Among all the pondering, I recall imagining where the
“Mythical” city of
I admit there is so many places it could have been,
one considered and most suspect location is none other that the Yucatan Peninsula, its kindom extending as far north as Northern Arizona and even partly into
It is said that Suchandra was the first notable King of
Shambahla and said to have been so in 900 BC to 876 BC, so I presume there was a city at this early time, this would have
been not long after King Hiram, King of Tyre and friend of King Soloman has his
encounter with the Queen of Sheba, or was it Shem-bahla? the very event which spawned the entire religion, when Hiram traveled to the
I highly recommend a read of 1st Kings of
the Bible, Chapter 10. There has been much conjecture about the Queen of Sheba
in that she was African or from
But the largest reason I have chosen the
Of Suchandra the second Buddha, it is also said that
he built a huge 3 dimensional Kalachakra Manala in the center of
the Kingdom, now I know that the use of the word “huge” is a broad term, no pun
intended, and is open to interpretation, but… wouldn’t you say that in the
following image, that this is without a doubt a “huge Kalachakra Manala” found in the center of an ancient kingdom?
Has any other been found anywhere?
The Aztec Sunstone
The monument is not a functioning
calendar, but instead uses the calendrical glyphs to reference the cyclical concepts of time and its
relationship to the cosmic conflicts within the Aztec ideology
Kalachakra Means ”wheel of time, or Time Cycles”
And this is what the early academics called it
EVERY Photo I have seen of the Aztec Sun Stone, not necessarily intentional, but seems to downplay the actual size of it, this Kalachakra Mandala, is 12 feet in diameter over 3 feet thick and weighs in at just over 26 TONS!
A better photo to understand just how
big it is..
Is it possible the academics are again wrong [Intentionally this time on] their dates in which they claim it was created somewhere around 1500 AD? This is based on the idea that they claim Moctezuma II’s name is on the Sunstone, WHERE I ask? His title might be on the stone but it is the same title held by every other precious monarch.
There is no way in hell! the academics are going to
tell any of us, that a culture was here capable of making such a thing in 900
BC! And a culture no less that just might be the very people of the Queen of
Sheba! The very same people who built the underground city of the
IF the sunstone was found in
period, before 2000 BC, saw the first developments in agriculture and the
earliest villages. The Preclassic period (c. 2000 BC to 250 AD) saw the
establishment of the first complex societies in the Maya region, and the
cultivation of the staple crops of the Maya diet,
including maize, beans, squashes, and chili peppers. The first Maya cities developed around
750 BC, and by 500 BC these cities possessed monumental architecture,
including large temples with elaborate stucco façades. Hieroglyphic
writing was being used in the Maya region by the 3rd century BC. In the Late
Preclassic a number of large cities developed in the
Whether I am right or wrong is to early to say, the
bottom line however is, if anyone wants to know where the so called mythical
As a side note,
I have spent 2 full days researching and writing this article… still seeking donations... Thank you to those who have made a difference through your