Original Article Dec 26h 2012
Expanded
Article
The Clovis Fluted Point was first found and recognized
in 1929 and named for the site in which it was found,
The Fluted
Now we know that the people who are responsible for
these artifacts could not possibly have been here 13,500 years ago by reasons
covered in the Book Nephite North and concerning the Radio Metric Guessing game
and the reliability of it along with other reasons found in other sections of the book
supporting a young earth belief. So we are left to look at the evidence from a
different perspective as we know that the people responsible arrived here about
600 BC. There are only three significant groups of people considered, who came
to this land and established colonies if you exclude the modern day Gentile
which includes the Roman Colonies. One whose arrival was about 2400 BC,(Jaredite) another
some time prior to 900 BC (People of India) and the latter of 600 BC (Hebrew), the latter is likely the creators
of the
As I skim through all the information on the internet today pertaining to the Clovis we find still, people arguing about who first discovered America, I have the answer, It was God, so why can’t we stop with the pride and just accept the fact that some man was the first here on this continent and that man was Adam, call him white, black, yellow or pink if you choose and mold him into your agenda, but this is a fact and regardless of the evidences, this will be known in the end and as I have said before, this was approximately 6,000 years ago. Prior to Adam, there was no death on this planet in its present creation.
So, if man did not come into existence until 6,000
years ago, when were these Paleo-Indians
coming here to make the Fluted and or
It is a fact that someone made them, it is a fact that they did it some time in the past and it is a fact that they were made on this continent. What color their skin was, is not an issue because frankly I don’t care, do you?
The
Clovis points can be found from the West to the East
and from the North to the South and the
In recent years, a very sharp man in my humble opinion, by the name of Dennis Stanford of the Smithsonian Institute no less, gave a lecture at Gustavus Aldophus College, Saint Peter, Minnesota of which you can view on Youtube (The Blue Eyed Indian), where in he explains some very interesting information pertaining to Clovis. This mentioned video is now gone from Youtube, however Dennis’s presentations continue and you can see one of the latest at the same college here…
In spite of the fact that Mr. Stanford has been sucked
into the 4.5 Billion Year old earth theory giving erroneous dates based on theCarbon 14 Guessing game, Mr. Stanford shows facts concerning
In Mr. Stanford’s lecture he makes a definitive
connection with the Solutrean Culture of Spain and France, a culture thought to
have existed 21,000 to 17,000 years ago and disappearing around 15,000 years
ago. Gee, I wonder where they went. Mr. Stanford shows what can only be
Solutrean tools (Pre Clovis) found at
numerous sites on the Delmarva Peninsula, at a slightly deeper level from where
Regardless, if in fact the Solutrean Culture and the Clovis Culture are one and the same people, they were not the first Americans. Why is it we do not find similar evidence of the first Americans? The People of Japeth or whom some call Jaredites? The answer is simple, copper and brass deteriorate….
I will give the reader a reminder in comparing the
Haplogroup X distribution map from the book Nephite North and that of
the Clovis/Solutrean Map below. Compare to Solutrean and Clovis maps.
Haplogroup X Distribution
What are the chances that these two places of origins
and first inhabitance could be in the same places and yet to date we still have
no connection to Siberia whether linguistic, or by artifact and yet those
stubborn prideful men of science still refuse to believe in a God and turn to
his scribes rather than Darwin. Why not just create an ice bridge from Europe
to New
In the following article from FoxNews.com titled European Seal Hunters may have been the first Americans, it seems those responsible for it are trying desperately to cast doubt on the hypothesis of Dennis Stanford…
The tools don’t match
Recent studies (but
we’re not going to tell you what they are!)
have suggested that
the glaciers that helped form the bridge connecting Siberia and Alaska [presented
as if it were a fact] began
receding around 17,000 to 13,000 years ago, leaving very little chance that
people walked from one continent to the other.
Also, when archaeologist Dennis Stanford of the
Smithsonian Institution places American spearheads, called
Instead, Stanford said today,
There’s just one problem with this
hypothesis—Solutrean toolmakers lived in
Why can’t these people get away from this land ice bridge
ice age crap, haven’t they ever heard of a boat? Apparently they diminish those
responsible for the Solutrean and
The lost hunting party
Stanford has an idea for how humans
crossed the Atlantic, though—boats. Art from that era indicates that Solutrean
populations in northern Spain were hunting marine animals, such as seals,
walrus, and tuna.
They may have even made their way into the floating
ice chunks that unite immense harp seal populations in
Inuit use large, open hunting boats constructed from
animal skins for longer trips or big hunts. These boats, called
umiaq, can hold a dozen adults, as well as several children, dead seals or
walruses, and even dog-sled teams. Inuit have been building these boats for
thousands of years, and Stanford believes that Solutrean people may have used a
similar design.
It’s possible that some groups of these hunters
ventured out as
far as
“You get three boats loaded up like this and you would
have a viable population,” Stanford said. “You could actually get a whole bunch
of people washing up on
Some scientists believe that the Solutrean peoples
were responsible for much of the cave art in
“I don’t know,” Stanford said. “But you’re looking at
a long distance inland, 100 miles or so, before they would get to caves to do
art in.”
Not only is it possible the Solutreans
ventured out as far as
Raudhkollsstadhir
and Stykkishólmur and they
will eventually find this was an intentional act in establishing a trade route.
These people were not the simple minded people they portray them as, they
didn’t just pile into a big bowl like boat and drift until there luck panned
out. They may have hunted the marine animals mentioned but when their luck was
poor, they always had their gardens to turn to. As for the question asked by
Stanford’s opponents regarding cave art? Perhaps they have never heard of
Native American Pictographs and Petroglyphs. They will also come to know some
day, these people were not necessarily Europeans by today understands but were
Hebrews coming out of
Solutrean
hypothesis
From Wikipedia
Examples of
Solutrean
tools, 22,000-17,000 BP, Crôt du Charnier, Solutré-Pouilly,
The Solutrean
hypothesis is an alternative
theory about the Settlement of
the
According to this hypothesis, people
associated with the Solutrean culture migrated from Ice Age Europe to North America, bringing their methods of making stone toolswith them
and providing the basis for the later Clovis technology found throughout North
America. The hypothesis rests upon proposed similarities between European
Solutrean and Early American Clovis lithic technology. Many archaeologists
have criticized the proposed similarities as too insignificant and just as
likely to be due to chance as to shared origins. As one has said, "few if
any archaeologists -- or, for that matter, geneticists, linguists, or physical
anthropologists -- take seriously the idea of a Solutrean colonization of
Though the proponents cite recent
archaeological findings in support of the theory, the hypothesis has generally
not been well received. A recent DNA study challenges a genetic argument often
made in favor of the hypothesis. The study argues against the apparently
anomalous mtDNA Haplogroup X2A having migrated to the
Clovis/Fluted
Distribution,
Compare to the Paleo
(
The Haplo Group X Distribution
Map
What does this all mean? It means these so
called “Paleo Indians” were not here
12,800 years ago.
Concerning Chapter 7 of Nephite North,
Oceanic Evidences and Oil Deposits it
was this information about the Clovis/Solutrean connection that caused me to
lean more towards a lower Narrow Neck location. The red dot is
a prime location for arrowhead source material; it just didn’t make sense that
the people would cross the upper location I had previously thought and then
come south and out onto a peninsula to get their materials for Arrowheads. I also noticed that this above map helps shed
some light on where major battles may have taken place, and where they have
taken place several times for a very long time. Compare the above with not only
the new narrow neck location but all the previous information concerning Nephi
city,
If the large red dot represents a major
source of flint in which much of the western arrowheads were made from it just
seems the narrow neck may not have been as you see above, although both
proposed narrow neck locations are plausible, the following just makes more
sense given this source location and where in the obvious battles took place at
its west end. But then again, the source material is where it is…. Just for notice, the above and below earth images
showing the oceans in BC times is not arbitrary, it is based on cretaceous data,
geologic and archeological evidence and oil/gas spot maps which can be very
telling, oil exploration and drilling is almost always where there was an
ancient ocean or large bodies of water. The problem with making it all come
together in proper time sequence is the erroneous faulty Radio Carbon Dating
system.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment!