Welcome to Tuscoro.com

Read More......



>

Tuesday, September 10, 2024

How deep does this rabbit hole go?

 

Part Five


Just when you thought I was almost winding down, I made the mistake of re-checking old measurements and checking new possibilities... again.

Well, to begin with and not offering explanation as the why who what where and when it would seem an intended measurement in the small triangle is slightly off, I am not certain at this point but in doing a mean measurement of the triangle, inspired by findings in the large triangle, rather than assuming the inside edge of the rocks were intended, I find a high probability that the base measurement for the small triangle is 48 feet, not 46 or was both intended, One as a mean measurement and one as a more defined, But why?

48 x 1.2 = 57.6

Using the mean measurement of 72.874 feet (Height of the triangle) x 24 (Half of Base) to get the area square footage of the triangle I get 1748.976, well, what is so significant about this number? Divided by 2, it will give you 874 (Ark of the Covenant) Why divide it by two? The short of it as far as I can tell at this point, is the conversion factor from feet to cubits, more on this later…maybe. I might at this time again point out that 874 inches = 72.83 feet.

Using the actual measurement 48 feet for the mean base X the golden ratio gives me 77.664 (side of triangle) and changing the height of the triangle to 74 feet. To get the area of square feet within the triangle, 24 x 74 = 1776, now divided by 2 = 888, what gives here? I still can’t explain it. 74 feet = 888 inches. 7761 / 88.8 = 87.4

Now what brought this on was when I decided to check the absolute square footage of the large triangle to see if it yielded anything interesting, the height measurement of the triangle I derived at with a 244 foot side is 232 and x 75.375 which is 1 half base I get 17487 and again, what is so significant about this number? Well if you divide it by 874 I get 20 why 20? This tells me this large triangle is 10 times larger than the small triangle as far as area or square footage. So if you divide 17487 by 10 you get 1748.7 and divided by 874 = 2. Well… there is that conversion factor again of 2:1.

Now if you convert the 232 feet and 75.375 feet to cubits and multiply them you get you get and area of 7768 cubits.

7768.11 divided by 8.888 = 874, another of the many coincident I’m sure…

The Ark of the Covenant by volume is 7776 Square Etzbah.

I also find that if you take the number 1748.7 Span, it equals 874 Cubits.

1776 Span = 888 Cubits

1777 = Jesus of Nazareth

Now, another friend brought to my attention the number of the vail, which is the correct spelling found in the Old Testament the numerical value of which is 700. I also find the Hebrew word for Inheritance = 93

Now unless I have missed something and I am sure I have, here is where I will take this already deep rabbit hole a little deeper…

If you have read the Walk in the Park and you are familiar with the path, you will understand that you begin at the smaller triangle in the meadow, gather the instructions and follow the path at 215 degrees using the information gathered being the measurements, multipliers and such, the object being to recreate ( not literally), a larger triangle on the hill using the information to establish the points and revealing the end results ending at the target no matter which instructions of the many you follow.

Rather than write a story and using the words which correspond with the Hebrew Numerical value in italicized, I am going to let you do it because if I were to do it, it would amount to nothing more than opinion or conjecture, and you will see the numbers are properly placed coinciding with history and prophecy according to the path you would follow using the story of the Israelites.



Multipliers.

15 Feet = 10 Cubits (10 Times)

12 Feet = 8 Cubits

7.5 Feet = 5 Cubits

15, 12 and 7.5 are used as multipliers, 15 feet or 10 Cubits is used for everything pertaining to the Large Triangle, 12 feet or 8 Cubits seems to be pertaining to the lower triangle and other factors, the 7.5 feet or 5 Cubits seems to be related to other factors.

Below are the Hebrew word numerical values in the order they occur if you follow the path; and other words found with the same numerical value.

Multipliers in Feet

15 come, high, garment, Lord, valley, glory, meadow, stretch, exalt.

12 height, gold, twelve.

7.5 (7) short, devise, give.

75 priest, tribe, stretch, foundation, temple, begin, Jew, redeem.

Multipliers in Cubits

15 feet = 10, come, fleece, high.

12 feet = 8 begin, come, return, stave, father.

7.5 feet = 5 come, Lord, portion.

46 God, Levi, Cubit, Lord, Stave, boarder, hide, redeem, captivity.

48 Tabernacle, Father, beginning, Cubit, uncover, God, Lehi, hide, measure, rejoice, magnify.

57.5 (57) build, boarder, cubit, south, Levite, Mother, comfort, magnify, no, unclean, perish.

575 open, eleven, riches, gate, remain, threshold, earthquake, removed.

(And the word of the LORD came unto me, saying,= 575)

576 tenth, ten, commandments, afflict, degree, earthquake, corner.

570 (All these are the twelve)

74 son, wise, judge, guard, lead, rest, come, vessel, build, redeem, prophet, begin, foundation, rest, seek, stretch, bow, offer, reprove, mercy, teach, hope, wise, garment, seek, sin, Babylon.

77 mother, sockets, sacrifice, Eden, mercy, altar, gilgal,(Circle of Stones), serve, temple, iniquity, vanity, secret, fool, perish, unclean, hide.

(72).5 go, between, son, mercy, sacrifice, eat, tabernacle, measure, star, God, Lord, night, prince, reward.

(54).38 Dan, tribe, son, David, come, uncover, gold, God, redeem, magnify, measure, Rod.

541 Israel

(33).61 Father, but, hold, enemy, feast, hide, wait, mediation, look, pure, vision, weep.

88 God, Son, mercy, wash, lead, come, Caleb, tabernacles, father, Levites, magnify, sin, harlet.

215 Degrees upward, mountain, after, before, tree, Lord, place, silver, teach, battlement, valley, prevail, way, enlarge, ten, create.

142 journey, offering, gather, flee, trespass, haste, son, flee, find, fail, God, fear, prepare, iniquity, before, furnace, magnify, distracted, saints, among,

230 way, bless, before, journey, enlarge, work, flee, chamber, valley, chosen, Saviour, divine, silver, spirit, diadem.

372 or 373

603 gather, first, place.

606 six, gate, side, first, come, search, dig, see, righteousness, commandments, den, Jerusalem, gate, trumpet, rejoice, fail, mock, hiss, drunkenness, counsel

696 menowrah (Menorah)

700 Mercy Seat, Vail, Seth, foreskin, Atonement, thirty, joyful, accept, reproach, confounded, evil, gate.

700 (Vail) divided by 9 (Comforter) = 77.7 (77) mother, sacrifice, Eden, mercy, altar.

The Three Paths beginning at 603 or 606 which ever was intended..

93 Garden, alter, inheritance, sacrifice, precious, serve, uncover, bow, come, priest, stone, throne, prophet, tabernacle[s], prepare, strengthen.

57.5 (57) build, boarder, cubit, south, Levite, Mother, comfort, magnify, no, unclean, perish.

180 Degrees before, silver, upward, watchmen, journey, withhold, deliver, answer, curse, number, dig, double, tree, prosper, divide, defile, offering, door, knowledge, rod

150 foundation, contain, pillar, redemption, humble, wait, mourn, teach, unclean, proud, trespass, oppress, hypocrite, force, prevent.

144 Degrees portion, without, branch, east, redemption, forehead, half, divide, teach, gather, statute, forsake, redeem, comfort, mercy, yoke, Fast inherit.

243 Urim, remember, prolong,.

109 Degrees ???

700 Mercy Seat, Vail,



The Twelve Tribes Including Joseph, Reuben, and Gentiles.

Bold tribes are present by number, however I have not really searched for the others, (Numbers)

Ephraim 331

Manasseh 395

Judah 30

Levi 46 Levite 57

Benjamin 152

Dan 54

Simeon 466

Naphtali 570

Gad 7

Asher 501

Issachar 530

Zebulun 101

Joseph 156

Gentile 19

Reuben 259


Also this morning I discovered the triangle that goes most ignored which is basically sideways, with the target being the bottom right corner and new D being the top, and the bottom of the triangle is from the target to the New E, the volume or square feet is 6654.5, 6660 = 8880 span, 6660 divided by 7.5 = 888

Incidentally, there are 13 stones used in the configuration….. Two are suspect of being one…. a similitude of Joseph being split into two tribes? We shall see. Where is the similitude of one being expelled or moved out of its place? There is one stone which has without a doubt been moved out of its place. What should be 74 feet is 75 and the other side 73.

73 Removed

75 Cast off


Is or Was the Ark there?


In all probability this site of the triangle layout was not created as one of the temporary resting sites we read about in our scriptures, such as a place where the artifact was housed in a tent for a time as the Israelite's traveled in the wilderness. The reason I say this is in that the site lacks the evidence of being one of these temporary places. It would be better to say that the evidence is overwhelmingly present that it was a place where in the Ark rested for some time to be hidden due to iniquity and unworthiness. It would not have been necessary for instructions to be encoded within the construction of the small triangle to find some hidden point as the Israelites would have had full knowledge of where it was and used the Ark regularly if this had been an encampment or temporary location. What reason was there to construct this layout of stone unless for some religious belief to be used symbolic of those things associated with the artifact and hidden or obscured?

It would seem to me that in all likelihood, this is a place wherein the Ark rested for a long period of time hidden from the world in a time where in the Israelites or branch of, were in a state of iniquity and until such a time where in there was a worthy branch capable and worthy to bear it. If this is a place where the Ark rested for a time, the question begs, where did it go and who has it at this time, or where was it moved to and why if it was moved at all? How could they have accomplished this? Was there some reason this place high in the mountains was not considered a safe place?

We know Cump Murray, likely in the 1940’s was taking two of his white friends up the old road prior to the construction of the newer road, and telling them that all they had to do was drive to the end of the road and a half mile past, and that they would never have financial difficulties again. He mentioned it was a site his father had taken him to years before as a child disposing of evidence of the presence of the Spaniards; this would have been in the late 1800’s. This description would very easily fit either location on the mountain, the target, or the silver mine opposite the triangle location as the road ended a half mile short of either site. I find it interesting but sad that Cump Murray keeled over dead with a heart attack prior to reaching this site as if some divine intervention occurred. If true, why would this be necessary if the site Cump was headed to were nothing more than a Spanish Cache site or even an ancient cache site? If in fact the reason for his sudden death was due to the Sacredness of the place they were headed because of what it contained, what could possibly be that sacred? Was the Ark there in the 40’s? We know a site is considered sacred because of past events but the evidence is great in that just because something sacred occurred at a given place does not warrant divine intervention to keep it undefiled, we can clearly see this in the place where Jesus lived and the many events that took place.

A few would venture to say that Isaac Morely may have moved it, yet I personally see this as impossible. Who was going to help him move it? Morely was the man chosen by the Ute’s or Shoshone to go to the Sacred mine near this site but Morley was aged and respectfully declined recommending that Thomas Rhoades be the man. However remember, the Utes would only allow one man to go to the sacred mine, even if Thomas removed it, why? How? Who would have helped him? Only ONE man was allowed to go. The Indians in no way shape or form would have allowed this artifact to fall into the hands of the white man even IF they were trusted and for the very reasons it was kept from the Spaniards. Was the Artifact in question at this site? Most definitely, is it still at this site? Only God knows.

I invite you to read the following past Articles

Seeking the Ark of the Covenant Part ONE

Seeking the Ark of the Covenant Part TWO & THREE

Seeking the Ark of the Covenant Part FOUR & FIVE



Coincidences? Part Three


Coincidences?


Now for some of the details and strange things that have occurred and popped up including strange coincidences that have surfaced. Now all of you know I don’t believe in coincidence so let’s take a look at some of these strange things.

About two weeks ago we were in the area preparing to go up to the site again to check some possibilities and re-check some measurements. At this time I informed my two friends with me that day that there was something else I wanted to check. I told them that it just seems to me that if we have this right and these two points of measurements (603 feet and 603 + 93 being (696) are the most important parts of locating the intended target, then I would suspect something at these two points such as a monument or a marker of some kind. Little did I know, but this would prove correct by the following. Upon arriving at the second point of (696”) we found exactly where it should be, a flat triangle shaped rock being about 3 ½ feet at each of it’s sides and about 6 inches thick, one side of which was aligned as it should be with the base line coming from the original triangle and the point opposite pointing at the target which is the top of the smaller triangle within the new large triangle in which it lies, being at the east base of it.

Moving back to the first point of (603”) we find the same thing as just described other than it was a larger triangle being about 4 ½ feet at each side and about 8 inches thick, it to pointing to the same target. The positioning of these two triangle rocks is represented in the following figure and is enlarged as to actual size for clarification.



Figure 31


Coincidence? Sure, it could happen.


Figure 32

Large triangle rock.


Figure 33

Small triangle rock


Now not much has been said about pointer rocks 1 and 2, what was their purpose? I don’t know. Pointer number 1 if you will note does not fall in line with much and seems to be detached from the entire triangle, but look at the direction it points. It is pointing directly to the target but is that all?



Figure 34

Well if you will also note a line drawn extending from it and intercepting the line from A to E which is 88’ and intersecting at the Golden Ratio point of 54.3’, This line from the pointer to this intersecting point is just over 70 feet. This distance to the target is approximately 845’. 845 divided by the multiplier (Pointer 3) being 12 feet is 70.416. 54.38, the Golden Ratio of 88 and being the intersecting point X 15 = 815 which is the distance from that point to the furthest corner of the triangle created on the hill. It is 54.3’ from the tip of Pointer 1 to the tip of pointer 4 and it is 54.3’ from the tip of pointer 1 to the hidden point H.

Pointer 2, what was it’s purpose? Again I don’t know. The distance to the target it is pointing to is approximately 828 feet. 828 divided by the golden ratio 6 times consecutively is 46 being the base of the triangle and the distance from P2 to C.

57.5 being the distance from back side of C to hidden point H, X 15, (the multiplier P3) is 862.5 the exact distance from C to the target.

Now for the multipliers P3 and P4, one being 12’ and the other 15’. 12 X 15 = 180 which is the sum of the total angles used in triangles. 180 is also one of the key degrees used in this whole layout. Now I haven’t even scratched the surface on all the “coincidental” number equations I have come up with including significant biblical numbers that seem to pop up all over these triangles.

Jesus in the Hebrew language translates to 888 as each Hebrew letter has it’s numerical value also, the sum of which is 888. It is 888 feet from the extreme east side corner of the existing triangle to the extreme west side corner of the large triangle. In the Hebrew language the numerical value of the word Jerusalem, Saints, Corner Stone, and Holy of Hollies, is 864, the distance to the target from C Stone. There are many many more coincidences in this whole thing but I will end it here.


The Trail?

In part one of the report, I mentioned the so called trail and said I would come back to that. This so called trail, I believe was not a trail at all, for several reasons. If it were a trail it would have been a very heavily used trail. If it were a very heavily used trail then why does this it stop at the edge of the tree line? As some of you know the trail is picked up again to the North across the meadow at the turtle monument. Does this trail show the same “Heavy use?” No it does not, so why only within the tree line extending from the triangle to the beginning of the ledges located below the target?

It is my opinion that this was not intended to be a trail at all and was used for another purpose. What would that purpose be? First I would like you to focus on these large stones which form the triangle. Are these stones are not here because they were found just a few feet away? No, someone moved them here and put them into place, but from where? The closest place where stones of this size can be found, is exactly where this so called trail ends. It would be my guess that this is the place where these stones where brought from.

If this is true then in order for someone to move these 2000 lb rocks or bigger, you would have to cut a path at least 6 feet wide and dig down to solid ground which in this area is about 2 feet down. The reason for the solid ground is if you are to drag these stones off of this hill even on solid ground in dragging the stones they will dig down into the ground and dirt will pile in front of the stones making it very difficult to drag them. This is an area where there is nothing but Lodge Pole Pines. If it were me I’d cut up some of these lodge poles and cut them into 4-5 foot lengths and use them to roll the stones on and I believe this is what was done and this is why it had to be dug down to somewhat solid ground. As I said before the oldest tree growing in the middle of this path was 320 years.

Question is who did it? How many years passed before a tree began to grow in the middle of the path? After the path had been cleared did they use it as a trail? If so how long before they quit using it to the point which trees would grow there? How long before a pine nut could find its way through the now heavily packed soil in order to grow? These are the questions among many others that I have yet to learn. When I began this project I had many other questions I now feel I have the answers to. Perhaps if we continue to study the site we can find the answers to these questions and many others. Perhaps the answers lie within? Only time will tell.




Return to the Stones in the Meadow

Part Four

June 20th 2012


I had visited this site just weeks before this section was written due to some things that had been nagging at me for a few weeks. There were many things I wanted to double check, measurements and such; primarily I wanted to see just how much I was actually stretching things to fit what appeared obvious. After returning home and having a chance to review the information it would seem my suspicions were being confirmed through the numerical game this site has provided.

> At this point I might add that due to unavailability of a program which included Biblical numbers for conversion I left off on my research in 2006, since that time the program I used had added Biblical Numbers and in the late months of 2011, I picked up the project again and discovered this site had to have been laid out using these numbers. The elusive measurement of 3.83333E feet or 46 inches, turned out to be 2 and ½ Cubits. The multipliers of 12 foot and 15 , 12 was 8 Cubits and 15 converts to 10 Cubits.<

>Inserted Dec 2012<

If this site interests you, I seriously recommend a book by Bonnie Gaunt titled Stonehenge a Closer Look. If you have not read or are not familiar with the first part of this article, none of the following will make any sense to you…

As I studied the new information I realized there were many things I had not checked or re-checked so I scheduled another trip to the site just a few days later.

Now before I continue it is necessary to explain some of the inconsistencies that have occurred and make known some of the difficulties that are present at this site. In reality we have a bunch of rocks laying on the ground which do not seem to be positioned in such a way that mother nature could be responsible, if it were not for the map and near 25 years study of the Native American glyphs I think my occasional feeling of being victim of Charles Kenworthy might be confirmed. If you don’t know what this previous statement means, don’t loose sleep over it, just ask. The short of it is that it is the equivalency of a first time deer hunter in all his excitement of the first hunt, he could visually place deer horns on a beer can, these types can see what they want to see, not what is really there to see.

I am long past the point of wondering if this site is man made, it has been confirmed so many times I don’t know that I could explain it all, however the majority of you who may receive this portion of my documentation of this site have seen plenty to confirm the fact. I do not however see that it was created in the last 460 years or so, I have reason to believe it was created when the Aztec ancestors left this area, anywhere from 750 AD to 1150 AD not when they came back around 1550 fleeing before the Spaniards and I have reason to believe its origins is as far back as 400 AD.

One of the things which has caused some concern is the fact that some of the measurements I have established and used for near 6 years of study on this site are in fact slightly incorrect because these were established from the drawing of the layout of which I thought was accurate enough to do this. An example of this may be seen at the measurement from Pointer # 1 to the Golden Ration Point G of the measurement showing 88 feet from point E to A. This measurement from P1 to G using my draft of the site and a scale was established as 70 feet however I did not indicate whether it included the length of Pointer #1 and so this is one of the things I needed to confirm as I felt that this part of the layout which I never really understood and why it is there, it must have some significance or why is it included?

Another thing to consider is movement, now we only have a vague idea of how long this layout of stones has been here, and after seeing it in person and then considering all the measurements involved it becomes quite clear this thing was not done in a day how could all these numbers be present in so many places and correspond so well throughout? Yet, is it possible for these rocks to move due to Earthquakes or strange unexplained phenomena such as the race track rocks of Death Valley? How about a degree of erosion? I don’t know but it seems reasonable that some slight movement could have taken place. MOST of these seeming inconsistencies are within one inch to maybe 2-3 inches and this seems trivial when you are dealing with un-hewn stones and footage rather than inches. However one measurement seems to be off by as much as 15 inches and its corresponding measurement seems to be off as well in opposition indication some movement of at least this one stone, however it is not what I would call an important stone in this layout and the fact that so much more at this site confirms its origin of man, I don’t let it bother my melancholy nature… to much.



With that said, we arrived at the site and one of the first things I just had to do and have wanted to do for near 6 years, was actually pull string from point to point planting stakes in the ground to give a better physical view which in my mind helps refine the measurements, we also used a transit and a 300 foot tape. In the image above I had at previous times established a measurement of 70 feet at the point between Point # 1 and Golden Ratio point G.

Not knowing whether I had included the length of the pointer, I decided to physically measure this again. I did find in my old notes the pointer was 6 feet long and this was confirmed. Yet being uncertain of the distance between the tip of the pointer and point G, I re-measured what I have always called 88 feet between E and A and in reality, not taking into consideration any possible movement, erosion or the like I came up with 88 feet and 5 inches or 88.4167. Now the perfectionist I can be at times, I would much rather have see 88.8 or just 88 but it is what it is and it wasn’t a beer can with horns.

So to establish the correct Golden ratio point of 88.4167, we take 88.4167 divided by 1.618 = 54.6456 and a few more numbers… and by the way, 54.64 feet is equal to the 874.2 Hebrew Etzbah (¾ of an inch), 874 being the Hebrew gematria or numerical value of Ark of the Covenant just as I had suspected. Now being a perfectionist I wanted the remainder of the line or short side of this Golden Ratio to be significant as well and it ended up 33.77, 33.33 would have been better or would it? It is what it is and this is the words that I find in my head constantly. By the way, the numerical value of the Hebrew word Israel = 541. 541 etzbah = 33.81 feet, only one half inch difference from 33.77.

33.81 + 54.1 = 87. 91 or (88). Why would the subject of the Ark of the Covenant and the House of Israel seemingly be present at this site? What do they have to do with each other? If we take the Ark of the Covenant 874 and we minus Israel 541, what will that leave us with? 333, darkness, kill, lie, burn, help, destroy, Hebrew, Carcass, forget, tribe, haste, all words with the numerical value of 333.

Now the number 874 got me excited enough but when I checked the measurement from the tip of the Pointer # 1 I almost fainted as it was a number I had looked for near 6 years on a hunch and suspicion and here it was, 66’ 6” or 66.5. Now some of you might be saying to yourself, “oooh” but this number does not mean what you think, yes, 666 is the mark of the beast but it is deeper than that and you need to search it out, perhaps I will give the Hebrew words later in that correspond to the number.

So what we have is, 66 feet and 6 inches + a 6 foot pointer which is 72.5.

The problem with this number 666 is I couldn’t get it to work with my agenda but what about 72.5? Now the rule I have come to notice concerning the two multipliers (pointers 3 and 4) as I have rightfully come to call them is that anything having to do with getting to AND establishing the larger triangle at the 215 degree line, multiplier # 4 is used of 15 feet, anything else the multiplier of 12 is used. Beings the line between G and pointer #1 has nothing to do with the creation of the larger triangle I choose 12. Now 874 Divided by 72.5 = 12.055, (12, multiplier # 3), and this is close enough even for me. I may also point out here that 72.83 = 874 Inches and so we are 4 inches short, or are we?

Well at this point I am feeling really good, yet I decided there were more measurements I had to check and so I did, numbers that should have been 57.5 were in fact 57.33, 57.1667 and 57.25. Now this is a key multiplier and I am a bit concerned as I have learned through trial and error of this number that which I had always thought to be 57.5 was more likely supposed to be 57.6. Now this bothered me for a time and then I realized than even in the worst case scenario in what this number is used for, it only made a difference of .35 inches in a 150 foot length so, I quit worrying about it.

Now my focus is on what I believe to be the most important stone in the layout and I have come to call it the Cache Stone or Stone C. Now although there are many other details yet to be uncovered, both figuratively and literal, from the back side of the stone C (center) to the hidden point, it measures 57’ 4” yet from the longest point on the right side of the back we do get 57.5 keeping in mind it is my belief that 57.6 was intended. Now feeling a little Kenworthy at this point I decided to measure the stone itself, now this seems fruitless as the stone is rough and somewhat odd shaped but basically it is a rectangle so of course I want to know if it is a Golden Ratio Rectangle. The mean measurements in inches are 93 x 36, interestingly enough the measurements of the medium Triangle is 57.6 Base, and 93 foot sides. 93 divide by GR = 57.478 and divided again by the Golden ration is 35.52, almost a half inch short. Ok so it is a golden ratio rectangle. Now I know I am reaching for things but this does yield some very interesting numbers but I admit I cannot place my finger firmly on anything.

Just for notice, as mentioned in the document Stones in the Meadow, 15 x 57.5 = 862.5 however it is likely 15 x 57.6 = 864. I do know that what ever this site is that it has to do with the Gathering of Israel as the significant numbers are present throughout such as 144 or the 144,000 who will be sealed, 12,000 from each of the 12 Tribes, also the numbers 888, 800, and 864 and so I am going to take a justifiable stab at this and point out that if you take this 864 of which will put you at the supposed entrance at the target and after the Ten lost tribes have been added, + 10 you get 874, Ark of the Covenant and then will the covenant be read and fulfilled. Kenworthy victim?.... Maybe.

Now let’s come back down to earth a bit and let me say, there is one more thing I did not measure when at the site last, and this has to do with the still elusive pointer # 2. I cannot confirm by drawings alone but the number I will be looking for is 874 and this will manifest itself with the measurement of 72.8333E which is 874 Inches or 72 feet and 10 inches. Keep in mind the measurement at Pointer # 1 to point G was 72.5 just 4 inches short of what I would like it to be. Perhaps the measurement I am going to confirm on my next trip will give justification of that missing 4 inches, I know some of you would say, 4 inches is acceptable, but it isn’t quite there for me, we’ll see. I have to stop now, my brain hurts.


Triangle Facts

864,000 Miles, the diameter of the sun.

86,400 seconds in one day.

8640 Miles, perimeter of square drawn on the circumference of the moon.

8640 hours in one 360 day year.

864 feet = the distance from C to New Hidden point or the target which is exactly at the opening of the crevice.

864 / 15 = 57.6

864 handbreadth = 144 cubit

864 span = 93.33 line (Side of large triangle = 93 feet)

864 feet = 576 Cubit, 57.5’ multiplier of large triangle.

86.4 feet = 57.6 Cubit

864 handbreadth = 216 feet, 4 x 216 = 864

864 Short Measurement to beginning of target.

864 = Numerical Greek value of the words, Jerusalem, Most Holy, Holy of Holies, Saints, Corner Stone. Law, Families, Write, Book, Declare, and Conflict.

888’ = the distance from the further most corner of small triangle to further most corner of Large triangle, the Total base line or width of triangles including the distance between them.

88 = Multiplier for distance, distance from point A to E

88.8E x GR (1.61803399) = 144

888’ / 12 = 74’ / 12” = 888” = side of small triangle

888 etzbah = 74 span

888 handbreadth = 74 Yards

888 Distance from most out side corners of base of triangles. East to West.

888 inches, sides of small Triangle.

888 Jesus, open, take, path, give, reprove, beseech

862 / 15 = 57.46

862 pattern, doors, tabernacle.

72.83 or 72.5 = 874 “

72.83 span = 874 etzba

72.83 yards = 874 handbreath

72.83 feet = 874 inches

690 / 15 = 46

690 / 12 = 57.5

690 = 460 cubits

691 Distance between two triangle at the base.

690 hide, instruct, show, work, three.

12 = the number used as a multiplier in the small triangle. 8 Cubits

15 = the number used as a multiplier in the large triangle. 10 Cubits

57.5 / 15 = 3.83333E which is = to 2.5 Cubits, 5 span or 15 handbreadth

46 / 12 = 3.83333E

15 x 12 = 180

46 x 57.5 = 2645 (264 The Truth)

46 = base of small triangle.

57.5 = multiplier for large triangle and base of medium triangle.

57.46 x 15 = 862 plus the missing 12 = 874 “Ark of the Covenant.”

874 Long Measurement from C Rock to target.

874 Families, Law, Corner, and “Ark of the Covenant.”

874 = the ark of the covenant and is 2 Cubits by 1.5 Cubits by 1.5 Cubits, this translates to 3’ x 2’ x 2’ which equals 12 square feet. Total square inches in the Ark is 144 per square foot x 12 = 1728 and divided by 2 = 864, the short distance from C to NH

612 Covenant

257 Ark

144,000 of the tribes of Israel who are to be sealed, 12,000 from each of the 12 tribes. At such a time when gathered the Ark will be opened and the Covenant read to serve as a witness for or against the people.

243 Long side of Large Triangle.

243 Urim, create, offspring, graven, remember, (Greek) lay, pass, treasury, receive.

150 Base of Large Triangle.

150 Contain, Foundation, Redemption, Trespass, Covered, wait.

93 Long side of Medium Triangle.

93 Garden, alter, inheritance, sacrifice, precious, serve, uncover, bow, come, priest, stone.

57.5 Base of Medium Triangle, also multiplier for large triangle and distance to the target.

575 open, riches, wonder, hide, remain, gate, threshold, earthquake, (Greek) white, Jew, liberty.

74 Long side of small triangle.

74’ x 12” = 888

74 Guard, wise, rest, sin, redeem, needy, wise.

74 Span = 888 Etzbah = 666 Inches

74 Cubits = 1777 Etzbah

1777 = Jesus of Nazareth

1777 = 888 Cubits

1777 Cubits = 888 Yards

46 Base of small triangle.

46 God, cubit, Levi, Lord, smite, hide, redeem, captivity.

48 Mean Measurement of base of small triangle

48 = Tabernacle, Father, beginning, Cubit, uncover, God, Lehi, hide, measure, rejoice, magnify.

48 Handbreadth = 12 feet = 144 inches

48 Span = 144 handbreadth = 576 etzbah

48 Cubits = 72’ = 864 inches

48 feet = 576 inches

15 Multiplier of large triangle.

15 one, garment, come, meadow, high, valley, come, stretch.

12 Multiplier of small triangle.

12 that, this, give, gold, perish, roof, tell, Gog, height, sorrow, desire.

Common denominator of 12 and 15 = 3

3 come, Father.

Base Measurements Cubits, Spans or Handbreadths.

215 Degrees direction of travel from small triangle to large triangle.

215 sword, giant, upward, mountain, tree, come, silver, generation, battlement, enlarge, ten, rock, create.

180 Degrees change of course from original course at first triangle rock to target.

180 upward, journey, curse, dig, tree, divide, go, knowledge, rod, offering.

211 Degrees from C to target

211 ard, mountain, light, find, conceive, pure, time,

144 Degrees, Easterly side of all triangles from the base to the top.

144 take, portion, branch, redemption, deliver, forehead, divide, teach gather, statute, prosper, forsake, voice, pursue, comfort, cut, yoke, change, Eden, find, take, rest, inherit.


324 Degrees, Opposite direction.

324 return, talk, near, reproach, bow, search.

112 Degrees, Westerly side.

112 come, lodge, redeem, mercy, line, wait, believe, serve.

292 Degrees, Opposite Direction

292 multiply, bless, Hebrew, uncover, rebellious, rich, remember.

800 Distance from top of large triangle to top of small triangle.

800 give, trumpet, destroy, salvation, judge, garment.


Overall View



The Number 57.6 (57.5) or 576 One of the seemingly most important numbers in this layout.

57.6 key base number in large and medium Triangle

576 Etzbah = 12 yards

576 Etzbah = 36 feet

576 Etzbah = 54.55 Links (54.5 = Golden Ratio of 88 or 54.63 = 874 Etzbah)

576 Etzbah = 48 Span

576 Etzbah = 24 Cubits

576 Etzbah = 144 Handbredth

576 Handbredth = 48 Yards

576 Handbredth = 144 Foot

576 Handbredth = 1728 Inches

576 Span = 1728 Handbredth / 2 = 864

576 Span = 144 Yards

576 Cubits = 864 Foot

576 / 666 = .864864864864864864

576 / 888 = .6486486486486486

576 / 144 = 4

576 = 24 x 24

576 = 4 x 6 x (4 x 6)

5.76 x 5.76 = 33.1776

57.6 x 15 = 864

57.6 = 1728 / 30

576 Hebrew words with same value

Tenth, ten, store, service, afflict, commandments, wonder, bed, stood, first, wickedness, burnt, blow, fail, divisions, deliver, riches, removed, unpunished, voice, degree, watchman, possession, cover, earthquake, drunkenness, prince, adultery, shake, wonder, corner.

57.5 (57) build, boarder, cubit, south, Levite, Mother, comfort, magnify, no, unclean, perish.

541 Israel,

grove, gift, find, serve, together, pray, corner, highway, come, kingdom, deliver, voice.

541 etzbah = 33.81 feet

541 handbreadth = 180 span = 90 cubits

66 prophecy, go, take, good, blood, garment, tribe, Lord, deliver, God, temple, measure, south, gilgal, join, nation, hold, vessel.

666 put, three, secret, compass, break, lift, scatter, end, commandment, wealth, finish, disperse, purify.

666 inches = 74 span or 888 Etzbah

666 feet = 888 span


How deep does this rabbit hole go?

Part Five 


Friday, September 6, 2024

Stones in the Meadow

 

In an effort to conceal the location of the following, many edits have been made. The following is with out question thee single most interesting thing I have ever found, it is, without elaborating as to why... what I believe is the most important site in the Northern Utah Mountains...

I will have to pass on how this all came about, but suffice it to say, we were privy to several old maps, one of them had some unusual unrecognizable features on it, one of which I recognized... as a result, I and a friend charted a course to locate what we knew was on the map... we were not disappointed....

Several trips would follow documenting and cataloging anything that might shed light on what we had found on the hill near the meadow. Months went by photographing, researching etc... but all seemed to come to a halt... months went by...

Now, up until that point in time, it was believed that what is located here is a ancient depository and most likely a records storage area. But we really didn’t have any evidence other than Spanish influence; to support this ancient view other than the symbols on the map and their suspected Indian meaning and origin and It did not make sense in regards to the time difference indicated as to the the old trail verses the carved trees.

In the first week of June of 2006 we visited the site again to check details of a theory we had been working on, which would latter prove invalid. Upon emerging from the trees from spending a few hours on the hill we stopped at our designated resting area, a large rock just outside the tree line.



Figure 17


While eating lunch and discussing the possibilities of this site my friend noticed an arrangement of large rocks which just did not seem natural in the way they were arranged and their overall shapes. I don't think I would have ever noticed them... Walking over to them there seemed to be 4 key stones of which 3 appeared to be an isosceles triangle. In pacing the distance between each of the 3 stones it appeared that this was the case but until we measured the distances and plotted their locations we would not know for sure. Below are introductory pictures as to how it appeared and an aerial drawing of the positioning.



Figure 18

As it looks viewed from the large stone (North Reference Stone)

Stones darkened using photo studio as they are difficult to see in pictures.



Figure 19



Figure 20


As viewed from the top stone. (Unaltered)


Figure 21


As viewed from the base of the triangle.


Figure 22


Overall layout of stones.

Doesn’t look like much does it? But just you wait.


Figure 23


Starting to look a little like a man made arrangement?

It gets better.

The rock in the top left corner is the rock referred to as

The “North Reference Rock”


Now I’m not going to bore you with all of the details of how we figured this out, but now I will give you some facts pertaining to this triangle. First, let’s get familiar with the triangle so that it is easier to follow my description. Each of the rocks will be given a letter or a number in which they will be referred to from here on. All of the main “Positioning” rocks will be given a letter including the “Hidden Golden Ratio points” the “Pointer” and multiplier rocks will be given a number.



Figure 24


Gathering your information.

Part Two... 


The following will be for the purpose of gathering your information that you may understand why this triangle exists and what it represents. As you will see this triangle isn’t some mans whim to make a triangle high in the mountains using rocks weighing thousands of pounds because he was board. But before we can figure out why this triangle is here, high in the mountains and who put it here and for what purpose, we need to understand that there is instructions here and the finder/reader is suppose to gather the information hidden within, using the Golden Ratio which is abundantly present in this layout as you may have already noticed or will see.

In the following you will get only a taste of all that is here but in order that you get the picture we need to understand the basic measurements that are present, understand the positioning of the rocks and the pointers. The apparent object is to create another isosceles triangle upon the hill following the base line represented between North end of Pointer 3 and Rock A and beyond A. The new triangle will be that of a different size as to this triangle, and when I say “create another on the hill” I do not mean literally as only TWO measurements are needed in order to locate what was intended target to be found on the hill, and which we had already found long before we knew this arrangement of stones existed. Keep in mind there are several ways this can be accomplished. I simply picked the easiest way for me to understand. By using the following numbers, the Golden Ratio and “Common Sense” you will see that this triangle is indeed a set of instructions to locate some hidden destination.



Figure 25


Now like I said you will only get a small taste of all that is present the object here is to get you familiar with the main triangle. Now in the above drawing I have eliminated the pointer numbers so you will have to refer to the drawing prior to it. Starting with pointers 3 and 4, these pointers are what I will call from here on “Multipliers” as this is exactly what they seem to be used for. 12 seems to pertain to this original triangle with a base of 46 and 15 seems to pertain to the triangle that is to be created up higher on the hill. The base number for this original triangle that will be used is 46. The base number we will use for the upper triangle will be 57.5. Just for reference and thought 15 / 12 = 1.25 and 57.5 / 46 = 1.25.

57.5 / 15 = 3.833333E and 46 / 12 = 3.833333E. This to me insinuates that this is the single unit of measure that was used by those who created this triangle, which is equal to 45.999999999999999999999999999996 inches, but we'll just say 46 inches, but who used a single unit of measurement which is equal to this? We don’t know. As you can see by now this is not a fluke of nature, this is man made. The question is, who created this triangle and why?

The numbers we will use for our measurements to find the end location will be 57.5 and 88 as these two numbers do not seem to have anything to do with the original triangle, but this is not the only reason for using these numbers, so let me walk you through it.



Figure 26


In figure 26 above, starting at pointer # 3 you measure the distance from P 3 to D which is 57.5 and times this by the Golden Ratio being 1.618 which equals 93. This is the first step and arriving at the second rock D you would take the sum of 93 and times it by the GR a second time which gives you 150. Now, there is two ways that can be used in determining how many times to multiply the base number of 57.5 by the GR. One way is by counting the rocks along the baseline and counting the beginning point ( P3) being one and arriving at the second rock ( D) being two and stopping as the next place if you were to continue is the other end of the line in which you will create latter. The other is to count the line intervals between the rocks including the end point. Now at this point I’d bet your wondering how would you know where you would start your new line?

If you will notice the positioning of Rock D you can see that if a perpendicular line is drawn from it towards center of the triangle you see it does not point to the top of the triangle as does Rock E. Careful examination of each rock in person will give you an indication of what is intended just by the positioning. So in traveling from P3 to D and establishing a line from D to H is what you will also do at an undisclosed point which we will get to later here in. The line that you will establish from D to E is automatic as it is the same length of the line from D to H. Now if I haven’t explained this well enough this triangle is a “Template” of what you are going to establish else where using enlarged baseline number such as 57.5 in this case.

The second measurement we need to obtain is the distance from this triangle to that undisclosed point. So that we can execute the details gathered in the previous paragraph.

It seemed to me that the thing that sounds logical is to use the other number represented in this base line that does not seem to have anything to do with the existing triangle, and that would be 88, the line from E to A. It also made sense to me that the North reference Stone (E) would be the starting point of creating this new line. Lets use the same method as we used above in counting the lines starting from P3, being the starting point.



Figure 27


If this is the way it was done then what we have is 4 lines resulting in 88 X GR = 142 X GR = 230 X GR = 372 X GR = 603. This should be the distance to the point in which you will now perform the instructions previously gathered. So beginning at the North Reference Stone (A), we now measure at 215 degrees 603 feet, 215 degrees being the direction of a line staring at P3 extending to the triangle, forming it’s base and then to Stone A and beyond in the direction of the red arrow shown in figure 27.




Figure 28


Figure 28 shows the end results of measuring from the NR Stone 603’ and 150’ at 180 degrees and continuing the line 150’ in order to establish the base of the new triangle.

After performing these instructions the rest is pretty much automatic, the next thing to do would be, from the 603’ mark, measure at 215 degrees 93 feet and establish a line at 145 degrees duplicating the original triangle but using the new measurements. 57.5 x GR = 93.




Figure 29


After this is completed just fill in the blanks and you will have a complete duplicate of the original triangle but with the new measurements and being a larger triangle. Now where in all of this does the intended target fit in? See for yourself in the following diagram.


Figure 30


Part Three

Coincidences?