Forward
Many years ago when I
first contemplated this particular subject, I recall as I read through the many
documents/books pertaining to Columbus coming to America including his own
translated Journals, something just wasn’t right, call it a gut feeling which is
how all of my theories have started, many of which I have taken to the point of
high probability even proven beyond a doubt, making it factual to at least
myself.
The following topic of
Columbus discovering America or did he discover America has long been proven to
me through research that he most certainly did not. However the question has
come to this topic, Did Columbus “Accidentally”
RE-discover what had already been discovered hundreds or even thousands of year
prior and was very well known by the European Royalty?
The other question that
has come as a result of these efforts is, what is it specifically that causes
certain groups to obscure this information and keep it from the general public,
an open and obvious act which seems to have begun in the mid 1800’s.
As of yesterday I felt
confident I had enough information to begin this write-up, but by the end of
the day and with my meticulous research tactics and findings, at the end of the
day, I was ready to scrap the project due to seeming correct documented
evidences, in fact this morning I decided or felt compelled to pick up on
another research project pertaining to the ancient Geographic’s of the Yucatan
Peninsula, when I stumbled upon something that offset my reasons for near
giving up yesterday, funny how things
work, It is things such as this that tells me I am on the right path… I need to
pay more attention to my gut feelings…
Smithsonian,
established on August 10, 1846
"for
the increase and diffusion of
knowledge,"
I
believe that Smithsonian started out with a good and noble cause, but when E.
G. Squire and E. H. Davis took over, they changed that motto to “for the increase of the delusion of knowledge”
The
Research…
When I write an article
it is usually based upon a long period of study concerning the very topic of
the article or a closely related topic. As a habit however, I do like to get
the orthodox thinking side of it all just prior to writing an article, and a simple
search of the internet will clearly show the many who seem to regurgitate each
other’s opinions and usually based upon the regurgitation of some Smithsonian
puppet. Each of you should try this, go to your favorite browser search window
and type “Who Discovered America”
After reading many of the articles you will quickly see what I mean. The point
being, after reading the many perspectives are you really any wiser? I for one
have found that rather than sifting through the garbage, I can get my answers
as to what the orthodox world believes by simply going to Wiki… I for one really don’t care who the people
think discovered America, It would seem in the race between Columbus, Leif
Eriksson, and the Chinese, Leif is slowly taking the lead, but I have some
terrible news for all of them….
If there is one thing all
perspectives can agree upon, when each of the claimed discoverers made their
landing, from shore, someone was peeking through the bushes at them. Why is it
we take the inhabitants obviously occupying the Americas longer than these
glory mongers family names have existed, and remove them from the very status
of being a man? Are we placing them in the same category as the animals
discovered on this land when whomever arrived? NONE OF THEM discovered America!
Before I end this rant,
try this, go to your choice of browsers And type in “History of the Americas, Wiki” “Voyages
of Christopher Columbus Wiki” or any related choice of words, and you will
find what appears to be a very well put together article of presumed facts, now
scroll to the bottom where you will find a very impressive list of references,
30 or more, now look at the dates of these references of which you will find,
not one written before 1900, in fact most are written within the last 20 years!
And almost NEVER will you find among the references, the original source
material for the subject at hand… In
fact you can research any of the books listed in those references, obtain a
copy and also in that book find an impressive list of references, and they too
will be a list of books written within the last 20 years of that books
publication! The point being is, those who write our wiki articles and the like
writers, are regurgitating what has
already been regurgitated many times over, I seriously doubt that any of the
referenced writers in the wiki articles nor those who contributed to the
articles, have ever themselves read the original source material for the topic!
This period of our history I call, of course, the Regurgitation Period.
Did Columbus discover America?
Let’s start with who
didn’t discover America, Columbus, and regardless of what the many writers have
regurgitated, I am not convinced that Columbus did not know where he was going
and what he was looking for. I am not convinced he thought he was looking for
the Indies as in below Japan and China. Did he “accidentally” find America? This
part of the now orthodox belief came in during what I call the delusion or indoctrination
period. This period began after the formation of Smithsonian and peaked
around 1900, and lives on to this day. This is a period in which many
translations of old documents took place, you see, now that the English
speaking people can now read these old Latin, Spanish etc… documents, those who
wish to keep their little secrets now have to take this newly available
knowledge and tell us new readers what the writer[s] were “actually” saying… because
they couldn’t have possibly meant what they said! I just assume they figured we
were just too stupid to understand. I
think I’ll stick to original source material…
Someday
perhaps I will go into the many reasons why I say Columbus likely knew not only
where he was going but what he was looking for, but one only need read his
Journal and letters to see but only if you have a broad perspective of past and
present events. In the many exploration documents when you read the many that do
exists, you begin to see patterns. One such pattern is whenever they
encountered something new, something they have not seen before, a new tree, a
fruit, vegetable or animal, they describe it as best they could, smell, appearance,
apparent usage etc… and compare to some existing thing in a short commentary.
An example of this would be the discovery or first time it had been seen by
Europeans on the 4th day of November 1492, is the Sweet Potato, the Batata or what is described in one of
the more credible translations, The
people have plenty of roots called zanahorias, (Yams or Sweet Potato’s) with a
smell like chesnuts ; or in another example wherein the translator removes
th word zanahorias and inserts the nonexistent
word of “mames” (Carrots) when the
written word is clearly zanahorias from
the presumed original text why do they do this? The point being here is that
Columbus and those with him, had no idea what these zanahorias were and offered commentary to describe what they were
seeing for the first time.
The
opposition to this little occurrence is they day after they arrived at this new
found land. One translator again purposely replaces the obvious word calabazas (Pumpkins) with the word calabashes (Gourdes) and also mentioned
in this 13th of October entry is Papagayos
(Parrot) but in both cases, there is no commentary nor a description given
and why? Because these two items mentioned were well known by Columbus and his expedition
team, but how could this be if the Pumpkin and Parrot were not known until
after the Europeans discovered America? How is it, an entry is made the very
day the parrot was first seen using the name which according to the etymology
derives from Byzantine Greek from the Medieval period. Papagas, meaning Parrot, a bird which would not be known for
another 1000 years?
Another
curious mention and apparent attempt to deter you from the truth is a mention
of Gran Can and the translators lead
you to believe this is a reference to the Great
Khan of China and one even goes a step further suggesting Kublia Khan, a
Chinese emperor. However no word was used implying “Kublia,” except maybe “Cami” found later in the document. Had
there been or not, I would have and do suspected the Maya city Culiacan
or the serpent deity, Kukulkan, or the Kan Dynasty of the
Maya, the Snake Kings, something our earlier excusists did not know about…
There
are many statements within the documents that could sway the thinking one way
or the other, but before I am convinced, I would like to hear some explanations
as to why Columbus or those with him had previous knowledge of Parrots and
Pumpkins.
I
am not sure what to make of the controversial letters from Paolo dal Pozzo
Toscanelli to Columbus prior to his voyage which many delusionists presume was very instrumental in his agenda. I have
not yet decided what was intended but I am certain the delusionists had their hands in it… It is said that the map sent to Columbus was destroyed, yet on the internet floats a supposed reconstructed map, how do you reconstruct that which was destroyed? Who added the names?
From
one of the letters to Columbus from Toscanelli… (Concerning the voyage)
…But you will not be able to
understand it thoroughly except with experience or discussion, as I have had
most fully, and good and true information
of mighty men and of great learning, who
have come from the said regions here to the Court of Rome, and of other merchants who have long trafficked in
those parts, men of great authority.
Who
could he possibly be talking about? I can’t help but reflect to the many Kings
of authority who on their crusades, came to the Americas such as the Roman Colonies
of 700 AD to about 1000 AD. I can’t help but wonder about the Indo Greeks not
long after they sacked India and pilferage their sacred libraries and
discovering their maps and their charted course who coincidentally came to the
Americas in about 100 BC after said sacking, all according to the information
given on the now pronounced hoax artifacts of the Tucson Lead Crosses, how
convenient.
My
wife finds the following in the The History of Grufydd ap Cynan 1883 by Arthur
Jones
concerning Prince Cynan listed # 4 in the genealogy of the Tucson Lead
Crosses…
Cynan may have died fairly soon after
the birth of their son Gruffydd, as the 13th century History of
Gruffydd ap Cynan details Cynan's ancestry but omits him from its account of
Gruffydd's youth. Instead, Gruffydd's mother tells him about his father and the
patrimony he should claim across the sea.
I
wonder what this Patrimony was, and across which sea? This was around 1020 A.D.
Do you recall the words shown on the Granata Nova Map, Septem (Seven) ciuitatum
(cities) and Patria? (Native land; home, native city; one's country) Patrimony
or Patrimonium (Inheritance) In the case of Prince Cynan ap Iago the Rhodan,
would this be his mother telling him about the land of his fathers, the land of
the seven cities he is to inherit? Was she suggesting this to be his native
land?
Cartographers
of the past
When
you open up and broaden your perspective concerning the many informational conflicts
found in our history, things that never made sense, strange artifacts that just
don’t fit, delusionists written conflicts and obvious attempts at explaining
what the first authors of America “really meant,” everything starts to fall
into place. Things which made no sense, begin to make sense…
What
are we to make of the many cities which appeared upon the maps of the 1500’s to
1700’s? Why would dozens of cartographers from different countries and different
time frames list cities on their maps that no one ever found? Lakes no one ever
made it to? Documenting things on their maps, features they could not have
known? How about capturing the very likeness of a highly sought after lake
which none of the earliest documented explorers ever found and it just happens
to near mirror a supposed very ancient lake but geologist today tell us that it
existed 33 Million years ago! How is this possible?
(SEE:
Searching For Lake Copala)
So
I am to understand that since the last voyage of Columbus in 1503, an Italian
Explorer acting in the name of Spain and who was said to be directed by
documents from Portuguese, who according to history never made it to the
mainland, followed by Juan Ponce de Leon in 1513 who landed in Florida and
charted some of the coastline, and few others, that all the details of the maps
to shortly follow were created? Ponce de
Leon is also known for searching for the Fountain of Youth, supposedly told to him by the natives, a corrupt version
of a true story and likely was intended the waters of eternal life.
But of course it is easier for the writers of Wiki or the delusionalist in
which their information derives, to just call it a myth rather than to
understand where this seeming ridiculous idea came from, besides, It might shed light on the... myth? of the Waters of Mormon located not to far north of where he was supposedly told of it, but we can't have that now can we?
Not
to long after Ponce, others made their way into the interior of today’s
northern Mexico and New Mexico, Alvar Nuñez Cabeza de Vaca, Don Antonio de
Mendoza, Frier Marco de Nica, and a few others, but it is said that Francisco
Vázquez de Coronado was the first to reach into the more Northern Territories
but this is not true. Coronado even lays claim to naming the city of Granada.
Marco de Nica is the first to mention the cities of Tontonteac, Acus (Axa) Ceula
and Marata (Todays Pueblo Grande) and I find no mention in the many exploration
documents of the other cities noted on the curious earliest maps, Tignus,
Chuhuco and the seven unnamed cities surrounding the nonexistent lake Copala,
where did these notations come from?
Looking
at the two supposed earliest maps, Americae Sive 1562 said to be the first of
California, and another, the Mercator map of 1569 of which I find this notation
translated from the old Latin…
The second object at which we aimed
was to represent the positions and the dimensions of the lands, as well as the
distances of places, as much in conformity with very truth as it is possible so
to do. To this we have given the greatest care, first by comparing the charts of the Castilians and of the Portuguese
with each other, then by comparing them with the greater number of records of
voyages both printed and in manuscript. (Gerard Mercator, Nova et Aucta
Orbis Terrae descriptio ad Usum Navigantium Emendate Accommodata)
What
charts of the Castilians and Portuguese? It would seem I have gone way off track
from Who discovered America?
So
who did discover America?
The
answers to all these questions one has to take into consideration the many inconsistencies,
legends of the Indigenous, unusual archaeologic discoveries that just don’t fit
and always rendered as a hoax, notations on the maps that don’t make sense and from
documents of the past, biblical records, and other scriptural records from
other religious groups not considered, historic accounts of places mentioned
and described by the Mongolian people, people of India, the Mayan, Aztec, Chinese,
Greeks, Romans and Hebrews and most important past polar locations due to poles
shifts, its effects, the inconsistencies of Radio Carbon Dating. All of these
things must be taken into consideration if you want to know the truth of who
discovered America and find the true history of this continent. It was well
known by the various Royal families of Europe, the Roman Empire, the Welsh, Italians,
French, Spanish, Portuguese, India, Hebrew and Chinese as to the existence of
this land, and they knew it was a promised land, a choice land, but not all
knew why, but the majority did not know the blessing pronounced upon this land
by the one true God, and more importantly, the curse.
The
answer to this question as to who discovered America, as we know it today is
was a people who has developed into what we now know as Altai Mongolians but at
a time where in the name was not even known. Their first leader was known by
name from two sources, the Mongolian and the pages of the Book of Either, and
his name was Moron. His name by ancient tradition remains upon the first places
where these people first migrated after leaving the great tower which you will
find in the tops of the Altai Mountains, the village of Moron. It takes its
name from the Moronguiin Khuree monastery on the banks of the river Delgermoron.
Also another village many miles to the east called Mörön, in Khentii. They are
the very people who the Mongolian and every Asian culture derive from, and they
came here in boats in about 2400 BC, not by a mythical Land Bridge. By their
own traditions, this occurred after a catastrophic flood and the fall of a
great tower where in the their God confused their tongue, this is preserved in their descendants in the Aztec record. And even they were
not the first to set foot on this land.
These
people knew the blessing and the curse pronounced upon this land and even
though they knew it first hand, even they eventually forgot and brought the
curse upon themselves, they were destroyed “as a people” but their DNA is
profound and abundant in the west from the very tips of the North of this
continent and to the southern tips in South America.
…whoso should possess this land of
promise, from that time henceforth and forever, should serve him, the true and
only God, or they should be swept off when the fulness of his wrath should come
upon them.
Each
and every culture who has not kept this condition and served the one true God upon this land, has been
destroyed as a people… only a mixture of them remains, preserved in the DNA of
the American Native People.
This
write up I admit is all over the place, but this is how it is, there is so much
to tell and this is such a small part. The subjects that intertwine are broad e difinitive, all having to do with each other. And then I open the can of worms with
this….
Why is it a Promised Land? What PLACE were they looking for? And what specifically
were they looking for? A
good read to learn the importance of these questions and of the contents supposedly destroyed, of the Library of Constantinople, (Even
from Wiki), would be of great benefit. Understanding its purpose, its contents
and how and when it was destroyed lends understanding as well, who was actually
responsible for its destruction, The Muslims of the Ottoman Empire or those who knew the importance
of keeping its contents from them? Is this concern just as valid today? What survived intentionally and where is it now? Understanding
and truth only comes when all things are considered, no matter how
controversial.
For
further reading to find answers, Read:
1st
Kings Chapter 9:26 to 10:13 and then with Hiram in mind, King of Tyre, a friend
to Solomon read at least, Ezekiel 28:12-14, and maybe even a bit more… They say
we cannot know nor do we know where this Land of Ophir was, and many of the scholars
of the past have made up their minds based on their unwillingness to consider…
however there are some who can know, but only because they do consider… This is
how it all began among the Royal descendants of King David, the knowledge and
the answers to these questions which have been sought after, come from the
events of King Solomon and King Hiram, and other sources they never knew.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment!