A compilation of early
Observations
of those who first
encountered the Native Americans
and what they knew of
their origins
If there is one thing the earliest of writers of the
explorers of this continent suspected, knew and understood, was that of certain
Native American tribes including the Aztec, they were at least in part of
Hebrew decent as a result of the many similarities in Jewish custom. Keep in
mind, there is no longer a point in arguing what the DNA is now showing and
confirming, those who have refuted it for so many years out of pride and threat
of loosing their good standing with the academic world by going against its
atheistic doctrine of Evolution.
Many of the authors of Academia beginning as early as the
1830’s, begin to hack away at the root of their own tree as their writings seem
to be more about discrediting the very people who formed their foundation than
they do in enlightening you upon truths discovered, they spend more time in
their books telling what isn’t true rather than what is trying to discredit the
former authors. Where were these critics prior to this time?
If you want me to believe or even consider some thing… I
will always seek out the most original source, authors who seem to have had no
agenda, simply reporting what they had experienced first hand in many cases,
such as James Adair, William Pigeon, Josiah Priest and others, show me the more
modern writers who were there to say it didn’t happen? A modern case of a
recent author who apparently had no agenda either and didn’t care what the
Academic world thought, was Frank C. Hibben, a highly respected man,
Anthropologist/Archaeologist and even today by many, but none dared challenge
the things he reported until he himself was no longer able to defend himself… I
have watched since his passing in 2002, the scum writers arise from the
academic world as they slowly create their propaganda to discredit him in his
findings, all in an effort to keep you in the dark concerning the truths of
this continent and I ask why? The rumors began just after his passing, but have
not yet reached full momentum, if you go to Google Search and type
his name, you will notice in the very first paragraph at the media controlled
wiki, it has begun, “He was also
controversial, being suspected of scientific
fraud during his studies of Paleo-Indian cultures. And of
course you notice there is no footnote offering giving support to this claim of
fraud, but I assure you, those who have a false agenda, are in the process of
formulating a false foundation for the claim… who suspects it? Where is the
accusers? What was Franks motive? What is the accusers motive? Regardless of
what the spineless scum come up with, it is a bald faced lie.
Another highly respected man by the name of Cyclone Covey
who passed in 2013, I was fortunate enough to speak with him just prior to his
passing, what an incredible man. Take notice, at this time, I find no blatant
attacks against his work, however there is attacks against what he defended, but
you will see and I am curious as to who the first will be in attacking this
mans character, his experience and the works he has accomplished with his most
controversial being concerning the Tucson Lead Artifacts found in 1924. Now
although the academic world had no personal knowledge of the 1st excavation
other than those present, they scampered to discredit the find and even as late
as 1994, the academic propaganda machine did the unthinkable, it is said that “Geologist Confirm” … the caliche
was formed in just hours… News Flash! Caliche has always formed in just hours,
my question is, in all the archaeologist reports of the past which has used
caliche as the evidence proving that some thing was millions of years old by
virtue of something being found in it, what are we to make of it now? It would
seem someone got caught with their pants down.
Why is it that those men seem to want to control what we
believe? Religious philosophers and scholars continuously waste ink and paper
trying to tell us what the prophets of old “Actually” meant when in FACT they
meant what they said and said what they meant, except in the case of a parable
where in it is always identified as such! The sad part is, the very week minded
fall for the propaganda machine on a daily basis.
Hebrew Scholar’s of today tell us what the scribe of
ancient times really meant and lead you to believe that the scribe of a given
work made a mistake? Who would know more about the ancient Hebrew, those who
spoke it, read it and wrote it or the so called Hebrew experts of today whom would
have you believe them just because they say so?
What was the motivation of the Earliest writers of the
past, those who spoke the truth of what they observed FIRST hand and were told
by the natives they LIVED with, and heard from their own mouths, are we to
believe that some identical agenda was had by the majority of the writers of
the near ancient past and that because some one today was indoctrinated by a
controlled education system of today, that their word is suddenly gospel over
and above what those who experienced it said?
What does it matter if Hebrew people came to America in
times past? What does it matter of Roman Jewish Colonies came here as early as
100 BC? What does it matter if the Bible is true? Book of Mormon or some
religion? What if the Land
of Ophir
If you choose to fall for this propaganda machine which is
alive and well today, have at it, I would gladly step out of your way.
Here are just a few of the many things written of the past
by those who were most qualified to say so of the day, but those who came after, over
one hundred years after and even today have an opinion, but have no foundation
for their ridiculous claims against the earliest of historians…
“The clergyman, in preparation for another world,
went to prayer, and, being a Welshman, prayed in the Welsh language. One or
more of the Indians was much surprised to hear him pray in their own language.
Upon this they spoke to him, and finding he could understand them, got the
sentence of death reversed, and his life was saved. They took him with them
into their country, where he found a tribe whose native language was Welsh,
though the dialect was a little different from his own, which he soon came to
understand. They showed him a book, which he found to be the Bible, but which
they could not read ; and on his reading and explaining it, their regard for
him was much heightened." After some time, the minister proposed to these
people to return to his own country, and promised to return again to them with
others of his friends, who would instruct them in Christianity ; but not long
after his return to England, he died, which put an end to his design.
It is very natural to inquire how these
Indians, though descended from the Welsh, came by books ; for it is well known
that the period at which the Welsh must have come to America, was long before
printing was discovered, or that any writings assumed the form of books as we
now have them. It should be here noted that Mr. Bealty travelled in the autumn
of 1766. Major Roger's, in his "Concise Account of North America,"
published in1765, notices the White Indians ; but the geography of their
country he leaves any where on the west of the Mississippi ; probably never
having visited them himself, although he tells us he had travelled very
extensively in the interior. "This fruitful country," he says,
"is at present inhabited by a nation of Indians, called by the others the
White Indians, on account of their complexion; they being much the fairest
Indians on the continent. They have, however, Indian eyes, and a certain guilty
Jewish cast with them.” (THE ABORIGINAL RACES OF NORTH AMERICA, Drake 1880)
“Adair mentions ornaments worn by the "
high priests " of the Southern tribes of Indians, which may have been
identical with those here described. He says : " The American archi-magus
wears a breastplate, made of a white conch shell, with two holes bored in the
middle of it, through which he puts the ends of an otter-skin strap, and
fastens a buck-horn button to the outside of each." {Adair's American
Indians, p. 84.) Our author does not fail to identify this badge with the
sacred urim and thummim of the Jewish high priest, and draws a notable argument therefrom in support
of his hypothesis of the Jewish origin of the American Indians. A similar
ornament is mentioned by Beverly , as one of the
principal decorations of the Indians of Virginia
(Ancient Monuments Squire/Davis 1847)
Footnotes
For their original, I am ready to believe
them of the Jewish race ; I mean of the stock of the ten tribes ; and that for
the following reasons : First, they were to go to a land not planted or known,
which to be sure Asia and Africa were, if not Europe, and he that intended that
extraordinary judgment upon them, might make the passage not uneasy to them, as
it is not impossible in itself, from the eastermost parts of Asia to the
western most parts of America. In the next place I find them of like
countenance, and their children of so lively resemblance, that a man would
think himself in Duke's-place or Bury-street in London
The horns on these head-dresses are but
loosely attached at the bottom, so that they easily fall back or forward,
according as the head is inclined forward or backward ; and by an ingenious
motion of the head, which is so slight as to be almost imperceptible—they are
made to balance to and fro> and sometimes, one backward and the other
forward like a horse's ears, giving a vast deal of expression and force of
character, to the appearance of the chief who is wearing them. This, reader, is
a remarkable instance (like hundreds of others), for its striking similarity to
Jewish customs, to the kerns (or keren, in Hebrew), the horns worn by the
Abysinian chiefs and Hebrews, as a symbol of power and command ; worn at great
parades and Celebrations of victories. (North American Indians Catlin 1841)
Like the Jews, the Indians offer their
first-fruits, they keep their new moons, and the feast of expiations at the end
of September or in the beginning of October ; they divide the year into four
seasons, corresponding with the Jewish festivals. According to Charlevoix and
Long, the brother of a deceased husband receives his widow into his house as a
guest, and after a suitable time considers her as a legitimate consort. In some
parts of North America circumcision is
practiced, and of this Acosta and Lopez de Gomara make mention. There is also
much analogy between the Hebrews and Indians in that which concerns various
rites and customs ; such as the ceremonies of purification, the use of the
bath, the ointment of bear's grease, fasting, and the manner of prayer. The
Indians likewise abstain from the blood of animals, as also from fish without
scales ; they consider divers quadrupeds unclean, as also certain birds and
reptiles, and they are accustomed to offer as an holocaust the firstlings of
the flock. Acosta and Emanuel de Moraez relate that various nations allow
matrimony with those only of their own tribe or lineage, this being, in their
view, a striking characteristic, very remarkable, and of much weight. But that
which most tends to fortify the opinion as to the Hebrew origin of the American
tribes, is a species of ark, seemingly like that of the Old Testament; this the
Indians take with them to war ; it is never permitted to touch the ground, but.
rests upon stones or pieces of wood, it being deemed sacrilegious and unlawful
to open it or look into it. The American priests scrupulously guard their
sanctuary, and the High Priest carries on his breast a white shell adorned with
precious stones, which recalls the Urim of the Jewish High Priest: of whom we
are also reminded by a band of white plumes on his forehead. (Peruvian
Antiquities, Rivero, Tschudi 1855)
The Opposition
For the serious researcher you
will find the majority of those early explorers, many with the credentials to
make the statements they did, who knew the Native American in general had
Jewish roots and traits of the Hebrew all seem to utter the same opinions of
the Native American Origins, until about 1830 to 1840 the opinions began to
change and the opposition who once held loyal to their piers, were now
discrediting them, but what I have found in a majority of those who are
commissioned by their indoctrination, um, I mean education controlled by Smithsonian,
to now change the belief of what those who experienced it knew…
Those who now offer their
opposition I have yet to find a one of them who gives a solid argument as to
why their once piers are now wrong.
Although John D Baldwin motives were slightly different, he
is a classic example of those who came after Smithsonian’s course and direction
was changed, who discredits those who were there and lived it, but gives
nothing in support as to why, other than a poorly written explanation with his
evidence amounting to nothing more than taking his word for it, absurd,
ridiculous etc… is not evidence.
This example below is an
excellent example of what became the norm, and exists to this day, It remind me
of theologians of today, explaining and trying to convince us of what the
prophets of old REALLY meant other than what they so plainly wrote….
From John D Baldwin, a Congregationalist, and
anthropological writer, having been indoctrinated at Yale, it is clear his
agenda, I wonder if he really knew how transparent he really was, and those
today who continue the practice to discredit those who were ACTUALLY there.
“One of these theories is (or was), that the original civilizers of Mexico and Central America were the "lost
ten tribes of Israel Temple Southwestern Asia , where
they dwelt after the destruction of their kingdom. They were " lost"
to the Jewish nation because they rebelled, apostatized, and, after their
subjugation by the Assyrians in 721 B.C., were to a great extent absorbed by
other peoples in that part of Asia Some of them probably were still in
Palestine when Christ appeared. This wild notion, called a theory scarcely
deserves so much attention. It is a lunatic fancy, possible only to men of a
certain class, which in our time does not multiply. (Ancient American Baldwin 1871
I wonder where the Spanish priests got those silly ideas....
Even though the DNA is confirming what the early explorers knew, many of the academic world are still kicking at the pricks…
Even though the DNA is confirming what the early explorers knew, many of the academic world are still kicking at the pricks…
Among many of the
tribes and the Aztec and Mayan, there is a tradition of two primary migrations
to the Americas ,
the first was from the west by sea around 2400 BC, the second was from the east
also by boat and is said to have occurred around 600 BC. Many others had come
in the interim. The first migration is associated according to the written
histories and oral traditions of various tribes, having come from a great tower
where the creator had confused their tongue. The second migration is associated
with the creator opening a path through a sea where in there leader led them
through. Of then times the details are intermixed and directions of east or
west reversed.
The following is
other accounts noted by the many early explorers/authors, and in these times
there was no opposition as there was beginning at about the same time as the
reorganization of Smithsonian by Squire and Davis. The observations they wrote
about, are now being confirmed with DNA Technology.
The first and most striking fact amongst the
North American Indians that refers us to the Jews, is that of their worshipping
in all parts, the Great Spirit, or Jehovah, as the Hebrews were ordered to do
by Divine precept, instead of a plurality of gods, as ancient pagans and
heathens did and their idols of their own formation. The North American
Indians, are no where idolaters they appeal at once to the Great Spirit, and
know of no mediator, either personal or symbolical. The Indian tribes are
everywhere divided into bands, with chiefs, symbols, badges, &c., and many
of their modes of worship I have found exceedingly like those of the Mosaic
institution. The Jews had their sanctum sanctorums, and so may it be said the
Indians have, in their council or medicine-houses, which are always held as
sacred places. As the Jews had, they have their high-priests and their
prophets. Amongst the Indians as amongst the ancient Hebrews, the women are not
allowed to worship with the men and in all cases also, they eat separately.
The Indians everywhere, like the Jews,
believe that they are the favorite people of the Great Spirit, and they are
certainly, like those ancient people, persecuted, as every man's hand seems
raised against them and they, like the Jews, destined to be dispersed over the
world, and seemingly scourged by the Almighty, and despised of man. In their
marriages, the Indians, as did the ancient Jews, uniformly buy their wives by
giving presents-and in many tribes, very closely resemble them in other forms
and ceremonies of their marriages, In their preparations for war, and in
peace-making, they are strikingly similar. In their treatment of the sick,
burial of the dead and mourning; they are also similar, In their bathing and
ablutions, at all seasons of the year, as a part of their religious observances
having separate places for men and women to perform these immersions -they
resemble again. And the custom amongst the women, of absenting themselves
during the lunar influences, is exactly consonant to the Mosaic law……
Amongst the list of their customs however,
we meet a number which had their origin it would seem, in the Jewish Ceremonial
code, and which are so very peculiar in their forms, that it would seem quite
improbable, and almost impossible, that two different people should ever have
hit upon them alike, without some knowledge of each other.(North American
Indians Vol 2 Catlin 1841)
...A very remarkable representation of the
ten plagues which God sent on Egypt, in order to punish Pharaoh's hardness of
heart, occurs in the eleventh and twelfth pages of the Borgian MS. Moses is
there painted holding up in his left hand his rod which became a serpent, and with
a furious gesture calling down plagues on the Egyptians. These plagues were
frogs, locusts, lice, flies, &c., all which seem to be represented in the
pages referred to; but the last and most dreadful were the thick darkness which
overspread Egypt for three days, and the death of the first-born of all the
Egyptians; the former of which is represented by the figure of an eclipse of
the sun, and the latter by Mictlanteotle, (or the god of the dead,) descending
in the form of a skeleton or a cadaverous body, from the rod of Moses. The
curious symbol of one serpent swallowing up another, occurs likewise in the
nineteenth page of the same MS. It is not extraordinary that the Mexicans, who
were acquainted with one portion of Exodus, -- that relating to the migration
of the children of Israel
from Egypt
A celebrated French traveler, M. de la Borde
(Caribbean . Paris
The following is a couple of many of the of Pachacutec Inca
Yupanqui Hymm Prayers composed for the Situa ceremony around 1440-1450 It would
seem clear they had a knowledge of the same God and Christ of the Hebrew.
Lord Wiracocha, Who says Let there be day, let there be night!
Who says, Let there be dawn, let it grow light Who makes the Sun, your son, move happy and blessed each day, so
that man whom you have made has light: My Wiracocha, shine on your Inca people,
illuminate your servants, whom you have
shepherded, let them live happy and blessed preserve them in peace, free of
sickness, free of pain.
Oh Creator, root of all, Wiracocha, end
of all, Lord in shining garments
who infuses life and sets all things in
order, saying, "Let there be
man! Let there be woman!" Molder, maker, to all things you have given
life: watch over them, keep them living prosperously, fortunately in safety and
peace. Where are you? Outside? Inside? Above this world in the clouds? Below
this world in the shades? Hear me! Answer me! Take my words to your heart! For
ages without end let me live, grasp me in your arms, hold me in your hands, receive this offering wherever you are,
my Lord, my Wiracocha.
Why must we fight the truth? How
is it men born of nature, willfully use their intelligence to come to the
conclusion that the nature they were born of, is somehow unintelligent? This I
will never understand…
John 10:16
And other sheep I have, which are not of this fold: them also I must
bring, and they shall hear my voice; and there shall be one fold, and one
shepherd.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for your comment!